vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Maison Solutions Inc. (MSS) and TEJON RANCH CO (TRC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Maison Solutions Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($27.6M vs $21.1M, roughly 1.3× TEJON RANCH CO). TEJON RANCH CO runs the higher net margin — 7.5% vs -18.0%, a 25.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, TEJON RANCH CO posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (17.7% vs -10.9%). Over the past eight quarters, TEJON RANCH CO's revenue compounded faster (68.8% CAGR vs 42.5%).
Maison Solutions Inc.MSSEarnings & Financial Report
Maison Solutions Inc. is a specialty home goods retail company that provides a diverse portfolio of stylish, affordably priced furniture, home decor items, and daily household products. Its primary market is the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area in China, serving mass consumers through both offline physical stores and online e-commerce channels.
Tejon Ranch Company, based in Lebec, California, is one of the largest private landowners in California. The company was incorporated in 1936 to organize the ownership of a large tract of land that was consolidated from four Mexican land grants acquired in the 1850s and 1860s by ranch founder Edward Fitzgerald Beale.
MSS vs TRC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $27.6M | $21.1M |
| Net Profit | $-5.0M | $1.6M |
| Gross Margin | 23.4% | 30.6% |
| Operating Margin | -4.9% | 10.9% |
| Net Margin | -18.0% | 7.5% |
| Revenue YoY | -10.9% | 17.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | -1840.5% | -64.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.23 | $0.05 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $27.6M | $21.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $27.2M | $12.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $34.4M | $8.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $32.3M | $8.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $29.4M | $17.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $28.2M | $10.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $16.9M | $5.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $13.6M | $7.4M |
| Q4 25 | $-5.0M | $1.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.5M | $1.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-287.4K | $-1.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.0M | $-1.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-256.0K | $4.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $700.9K | $-1.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.8M | $957.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-549.0K | $-914.0K |
| Q4 25 | 23.4% | 30.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 24.1% | 28.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.5% | 40.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 21.8% | 15.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 26.9% | 42.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 28.9% | 22.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 13.0% | 45.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 23.4% | 0.3% |
| Q4 25 | -4.9% | 10.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.7% | -16.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -15.9% | -48.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.7% | -50.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.2% | 11.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.3% | -34.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -14.4% | -62.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | -2.3% | -53.8% |
| Q4 25 | -18.0% | 7.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | -5.7% | 14.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.8% | -20.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.1% | -17.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -0.9% | 25.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.5% | -16.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -16.4% | 16.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | -4.0% | -12.3% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.23 | $0.05 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.08 | $0.06 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.02 | $-0.06 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.06 | $-0.05 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.01 | $0.16 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.04 | $-0.07 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.16 | $0.04 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.03 | $-0.03 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $9.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $2.6M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $11.6M | $475.2M |
| Total Assets | $75.4M | $630.5M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.22× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $9.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1M | $3.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $775.4K | $2.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $445.4K | $12.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $355.7K | $39.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $588.9K | $27.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.1M | $33.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $9.4M | $35.6M |
| Q4 25 | $2.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.6M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.6M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.6M | — |
| Q4 25 | $11.6M | $475.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.1M | $473.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.7M | $471.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $12.0M | $472.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.9M | $473.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.2M | $468.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.5M | $469.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $13.3M | $467.4M |
| Q4 25 | $75.4M | $630.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $73.3M | $629.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $77.4M | $618.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $82.7M | $614.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $82.7M | $608.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $82.1M | $598.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $82.4M | $590.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $44.2M | $581.6M |
| Q4 25 | 0.22× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.26× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.22× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.23× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.24× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.19× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-1.7M | $6.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 3.88× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-1.7M | $6.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1M | $-2.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.6M | $-381.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7M | $-1.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1M | $14.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.6M | $2.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.6M | $-1.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.4M | $777.0K |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-14.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-20.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-18.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-42.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-16.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-15.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-7.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -122.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -240.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -230.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -239.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -155.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -277.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -99.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 102.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 236.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 213.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 319.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 174.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 245.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 109.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | 3.88× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -1.43× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.66× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.19× | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.12× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -1.88× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
MSS
| Perishables | $14.4M | 52% |
| Nonperishables | $13.2M | 48% |
TRC
Segment breakdown not available.
