vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of MATRIX SERVICE CO (MTRX) and PROSPERITY BANCSHARES INC (PB). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
PROSPERITY BANCSHARES INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($367.6M vs $210.5M, roughly 1.7× MATRIX SERVICE CO). PROSPERITY BANCSHARES INC runs the higher net margin — 31.6% vs -0.4%, a 32.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. Over the past eight quarters, PROSPERITY BANCSHARES INC's revenue compounded faster (19.2% CAGR vs 12.6%).
Matrix Telecom, Inc., operating as Matrix Business Technologies, Trinsic, Powered by Matrix, Excel Telecommunications and various other niche brands is a United States telecommunications firm that provides voice and data services to consumers and small and medium businesses as well as multi-location distributed enterprise markets. The firm also provides wholesale voice services to the telecommunications, wireless and cable industries.
Prosperity Bancshares, Inc. is a bank holding company headquartered in Houston, Texas with operations in Texas and central Oklahoma. As of December 31, 2019, the company operated 285 branches: 65 in the Houston area, including The Woodlands, Texas; 30 in South Texas, including Corpus Christi, Texas and Victoria, Texas; 75 in the Dallas–Fort Worth metroplex; 22 in East Texas; 29 in Central Texas, including Austin, Texas and San Antonio; 34 in West Texas, including Lubbock, Texas, Midland–Odess...
MTRX vs PB — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $210.5M | $367.6M |
| Net Profit | $-894.0K | $116.3M |
| Gross Margin | 6.2% | — |
| Operating Margin | -1.0% | — |
| Net Margin | -0.4% | 31.6% |
| Revenue YoY | 12.5% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | 83.8% | -10.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.03 | $1.16 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $367.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $210.5M | $275.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $211.9M | $273.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $216.4M | $267.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $200.2M | $265.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $187.2M | $267.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $165.6M | $261.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $189.5M | $258.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | $116.3M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-894.0K | $139.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-3.7M | $137.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-11.3M | $135.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.4M | $130.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-5.5M | $130.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-9.2M | $127.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-4.4M | $111.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 6.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.6% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -1.0% | 65.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -2.6% | 64.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -6.0% | 64.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -2.5% | 62.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -3.4% | 62.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | -6.5% | 62.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -2.8% | 55.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | 31.6% | ||
| Q4 25 | -0.4% | 50.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | -1.7% | 50.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -5.2% | 50.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -1.7% | 49.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -3.0% | 48.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -5.6% | 48.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | -2.3% | 43.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.16 | ||
| Q4 25 | $-0.03 | $1.48 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.13 | $1.45 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.41 | $1.42 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.12 | $1.37 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.20 | $1.36 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.33 | $1.34 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.16 | $1.17 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $199.0M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $137.6M | $8.2B |
| Total Assets | $650.2M | $43.6B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $199.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $192.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $224.6M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $185.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $156.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $124.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $115.6M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $8.2B | ||
| Q4 25 | $137.6M | $7.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $136.3M | $7.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $142.7M | $7.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $150.7M | $7.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $151.9M | $7.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $156.5M | $7.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $164.2M | $7.3B |
| Q1 26 | — | $43.6B | ||
| Q4 25 | $650.2M | $38.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $598.2M | $38.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $600.3M | $38.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $613.7M | $38.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $513.8M | $39.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $470.2M | $40.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $451.4M | $39.8B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $7.5M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $6.3M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 3.0% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.6% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $45.5M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $7.5M | $78.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-25.9M | $194.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $40.7M | $98.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $31.2M | $178.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $33.6M | $-205.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.9M | $274.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $47.0M | $216.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $6.3M | $68.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-27.9M | $185.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $38.4M | $91.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $28.7M | $171.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $32.7M | $-210.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $10.0M | $270.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $45.7M | $211.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.0% | 24.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | -13.2% | 67.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 17.8% | 34.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.3% | 64.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 17.5% | -78.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.0% | 103.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 24.1% | 81.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.6% | 3.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.9% | 3.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.0% | 2.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.3% | 2.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.5% | 1.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.2% | 1.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.7% | 1.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.56× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.42× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.73× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.37× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -1.58× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.16× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.94× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
MTRX
| Storage And Terminal Solutions | $99.9M | 47% |
| Utility And Power Infrastructure | $75.4M | 36% |
| Process And Industrial Facilities | $35.3M | 17% |
PB
| Net Interest Income | $321.1M | 87% |
| Noninterest Income | $46.5M | 13% |
