vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Marwynn Holdings, Inc. (MWYN) and SAGTEC GLOBAL Ltd (SAGT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
SAGTEC GLOBAL Ltd is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($3.8M vs $2.3M, roughly 1.6× Marwynn Holdings, Inc.). SAGTEC GLOBAL Ltd runs the higher net margin — 19.7% vs -116.0%, a 135.7% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Marwynn Holdings, Inc. is a Canada-based investment holding company focused on acquiring, managing, and scaling middle-market businesses primarily across North America. Its core operating segments cover industrial products, consumer goods, and technology-enabled services, targeting sustainable long-term value creation for its stakeholders.
MWYN vs SAGT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.3M | $3.8M |
| Net Profit | $-2.7M | $744.4K |
| Gross Margin | 42.4% | 36.4% |
| Operating Margin | -115.8% | — |
| Net Margin | -116.0% | 19.7% |
| Revenue YoY | -13.3% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | -11713.9% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.16 | $0.05 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q3 25 | $2.3M | $3.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $623.7K | — |
| Q3 25 | $-2.7M | $744.4K | ||
| Q1 25 | $23.4K | — |
| Q3 25 | 42.4% | 36.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 39.2% | — |
| Q3 25 | -115.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.5% | — |
| Q3 25 | -116.0% | 19.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.8% | — |
| Q3 25 | $-0.16 | $0.05 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.00 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $313.5K |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.3M | $11.5M |
| Total Assets | $11.6M | $14.5M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | — | $313.5K | ||
| Q1 25 | $480 | — |
| Q3 25 | $2.3M | $11.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.4M | — |
| Q3 25 | $11.6M | $14.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $12.6M | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-95.1K | $5.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 6.93× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | $-95.1K | $5.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | — | 6.93× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
MWYN
| Other | $1.3M | 57% |
| Revenue From Recyclable Ewaste Materials Sales | $1.0M | 43% |
SAGT
Segment breakdown not available.
