vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Marwynn Holdings, Inc. (MWYN) and Meiwu Technology Co Ltd (WNW). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Meiwu Technology Co Ltd is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.5M vs $2.3M, roughly 1.1× Marwynn Holdings, Inc.). Meiwu Technology Co Ltd runs the higher net margin — -54.9% vs -116.0%, a 61.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Meiwu Technology Co Ltd posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (2775.9% vs -13.3%).
Marwynn Holdings, Inc. is a Canada-based investment holding company focused on acquiring, managing, and scaling middle-market businesses primarily across North America. Its core operating segments cover industrial products, consumer goods, and technology-enabled services, targeting sustainable long-term value creation for its stakeholders.
MWYN vs WNW — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q2 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.3M | $2.5M |
| Net Profit | $-2.7M | $-1.4M |
| Gross Margin | 42.4% | 12.8% |
| Operating Margin | -115.8% | -55.5% |
| Net Margin | -116.0% | -54.9% |
| Revenue YoY | -13.3% | 2775.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | -11713.9% | -293.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.16 | $-0.03 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q3 25 | $2.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $623.7K | — |
| Q3 25 | $-2.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-1.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $23.4K | — |
| Q3 25 | 42.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 12.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 39.2% | — |
| Q3 25 | -115.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -55.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.5% | — |
| Q3 25 | -116.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -54.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.8% | — |
| Q3 25 | $-0.16 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-0.03 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.00 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $33.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.3M | $58.4M |
| Total Assets | $11.6M | $60.1M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $33.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $480 | — |
| Q3 25 | $2.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $58.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.4M | — |
| Q3 25 | $11.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $60.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $12.6M | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-95.1K | $6.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | $-95.1K | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $6.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
MWYN
| Other | $1.3M | 57% |
| Revenue From Recyclable Ewaste Materials Sales | $1.0M | 43% |
WNW
Segment breakdown not available.
