vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of MAGNACHIP SEMICONDUCTOR Corp (MX) and ORASURE TECHNOLOGIES INC (OSUR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
MAGNACHIP SEMICONDUCTOR Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($40.6M vs $26.8M, roughly 1.5× ORASURE TECHNOLOGIES INC). MAGNACHIP SEMICONDUCTOR Corp runs the higher net margin — -19.9% vs -72.1%, a 52.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, MAGNACHIP SEMICONDUCTOR Corp posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-20.7% vs -28.5%). MAGNACHIP SEMICONDUCTOR Corp produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-4.8M vs $-9.9M). Over the past eight quarters, MAGNACHIP SEMICONDUCTOR Corp's revenue compounded faster (-3.4% CAGR vs -29.7%).
Magnachip Semiconductor Corp is a global semiconductor design and manufacturing firm specializing in high-performance analog and mixed-signal solutions. Its core products include display driver ICs, power management ICs and sensors, serving consumer electronics, automotive, industrial and communications markets worldwide.
OraSure Technologies, Inc. is a Bethlehem, Pennsylvania–based company in the medical device industry. Their products include diagnostic testing kits. The company had recently developed OraQuick testing kit, the first over-the-counter home HIV test.
MX vs OSUR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $40.6M | $26.8M |
| Net Profit | $-8.1M | $-19.3M |
| Gross Margin | 9.3% | 41.0% |
| Operating Margin | -26.1% | -75.1% |
| Net Margin | -19.9% | -72.1% |
| Revenue YoY | -20.7% | -28.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | 50.4% | -78.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.23 | $-0.28 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $40.6M | $26.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $45.9M | $27.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $47.6M | $31.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $44.7M | $29.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $51.2M | $37.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $55.4M | $39.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $46.4M | $54.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $43.4M | $54.1M |
| Q4 25 | $-8.1M | $-19.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-13.1M | $-13.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $323.0K | $-19.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-8.9M | $-16.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-16.3M | $-10.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-9.6M | $-4.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-13.0M | $-615.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-15.4M | $-3.6M |
| Q4 25 | 9.3% | 41.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 18.6% | 43.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 20.4% | 42.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 20.9% | 41.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 21.7% | 36.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.8% | 42.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 21.1% | 45.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 14.6% | 44.5% |
| Q4 25 | -26.1% | -75.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -25.1% | -59.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -15.6% | -57.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -14.1% | -59.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | -12.5% | -33.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | -8.1% | -15.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -12.3% | -5.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | -21.6% | -13.1% |
| Q4 25 | -19.9% | -72.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -28.5% | -50.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.7% | -63.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -19.9% | -53.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -31.8% | -28.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -17.3% | -11.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -28.0% | -1.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | -35.5% | -6.6% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.23 | $-0.28 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.36 | $-0.19 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.01 | $-0.26 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.24 | $-0.21 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.44 | $-0.14 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.26 | $-0.06 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.34 | $-0.01 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.40 | $-0.05 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $103.8M | $199.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $248.3M | $340.8M |
| Total Assets | $351.5M | $403.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $103.8M | $199.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $108.0M | $216.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $113.3M | $234.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $132.7M | $247.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $138.6M | $267.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $151.1M | $278.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $162.5M | $267.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $171.6M | $263.8M |
| Q4 25 | $248.3M | $340.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $255.3M | $362.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $270.2M | $380.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $269.2M | $396.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $276.8M | $410.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $299.6M | $425.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $305.8M | $425.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $321.9M | $426.3M |
| Q4 25 | $351.5M | $403.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $359.6M | $423.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $370.5M | $445.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $373.9M | $457.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $379.3M | $479.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $411.4M | $464.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $412.7M | $466.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $426.2M | $467.6M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $5.4M | $-9.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-4.8M | $-9.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -11.9% | -37.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 25.3% | 3.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-54.2M | $-53.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $5.4M | $-9.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $162.0K | $-10.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-25.1M | $-10.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-4.7M | $-19.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.9M | $109.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $-12.9M | $12.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.1M | $7.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-4.0M | $6.7M |
| Q4 25 | $-4.8M | $-9.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-7.5M | $-11.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-37.0M | $-12.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-4.9M | $-20.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.4M | $-347.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $-15.5M | $12.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.0M | $6.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-4.6M | $5.2M |
| Q4 25 | -11.9% | -37.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -16.3% | -40.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -77.7% | -38.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -10.9% | -67.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.7% | -0.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -28.0% | 31.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -4.3% | 11.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | -10.7% | 9.5% |
| Q4 25 | 25.3% | 3.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 16.7% | 3.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 24.9% | 6.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.5% | 1.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 14.5% | 1.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.7% | 0.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.9% | 3.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.5% | 2.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -77.81× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
MX
| Power Analog Solutions | $36.8M | 91% |
| Power Ic | $3.8M | 9% |
OSUR
| Product And Services | $24.9M | 93% |
| Other | $1.9M | 7% |
