vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of MAGNACHIP SEMICONDUCTOR Corp (MX) and Postal Realty Trust, Inc. (PSTL). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
MAGNACHIP SEMICONDUCTOR Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($40.6M vs $26.0M, roughly 1.6× Postal Realty Trust, Inc.). Postal Realty Trust, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 17.9% vs -19.9%, a 37.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Postal Realty Trust, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (21.7% vs -20.7%). Postal Realty Trust, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($37.6M vs $-4.8M). Over the past eight quarters, Postal Realty Trust, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (22.6% CAGR vs -3.4%).
Magnachip Semiconductor Corp is a global semiconductor design and manufacturing firm specializing in high-performance analog and mixed-signal solutions. Its core products include display driver ICs, power management ICs and sensors, serving consumer electronics, automotive, industrial and communications markets worldwide.
Postal Realty Trust, Inc. is a specialized real estate investment trust that acquires, owns, and manages properties primarily leased to the United States Postal Service. Its portfolio includes last-mile postal facilities, sorting centers, and retail post office locations across the U.S., supporting critical mail and package delivery infrastructure.
MX vs PSTL — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $40.6M | $26.0M |
| Net Profit | $-8.1M | $4.6M |
| Gross Margin | 9.3% | — |
| Operating Margin | -26.1% | 39.2% |
| Net Margin | -19.9% | 17.9% |
| Revenue YoY | -20.7% | 21.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | 50.4% | 3.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.23 | $0.16 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $40.6M | $26.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $45.9M | $24.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $47.6M | $23.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $44.7M | $22.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $51.2M | $21.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $55.4M | $19.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $46.4M | $18.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $43.4M | $17.3M |
| Q4 25 | $-8.1M | $4.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-13.1M | $3.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $323.0K | $3.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-8.9M | $2.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-16.3M | $4.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-9.6M | $1.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-13.0M | $817.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-15.4M | $206.0K |
| Q4 25 | 9.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 18.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 20.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 20.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 21.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 21.1% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 14.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | -26.1% | 39.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | -25.1% | 37.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -15.6% | 37.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -14.1% | 28.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | -12.5% | 43.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | -8.1% | 24.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -12.3% | 22.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | -21.6% | 17.6% |
| Q4 25 | -19.9% | 17.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | -28.5% | 15.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.7% | 15.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -19.9% | 9.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | -31.8% | 21.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -17.3% | 5.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -28.0% | 4.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | -35.5% | 1.2% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.23 | $0.16 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.36 | $0.13 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.01 | $0.12 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.24 | $0.06 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.44 | $0.17 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.26 | $0.03 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.34 | $0.02 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.40 | $-0.01 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $103.8M | $1.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $361.1M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $248.3M | $285.2M |
| Total Assets | $351.5M | $759.1M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 1.27× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $103.8M | $1.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $108.0M | $1.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $113.3M | $1.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $132.7M | $639.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $138.6M | $1.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $151.1M | $970.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $162.5M | $1.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $171.6M | $1.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | $361.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $347.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $328.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $306.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $296.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $277.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $273.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $247.6M |
| Q4 25 | $248.3M | $285.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $255.3M | $273.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $270.2M | $250.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $269.2M | $245.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $276.8M | $251.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $299.6M | $245.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $305.8M | $245.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $321.9M | $248.1M |
| Q4 25 | $351.5M | $759.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $359.6M | $735.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $370.5M | $689.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $373.9M | $654.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $379.3M | $646.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $411.4M | $615.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $412.7M | $608.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $426.2M | $584.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.27× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.27× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.31× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.25× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.18× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.13× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.11× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.00× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $5.4M | $44.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-4.8M | $37.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -11.9% | 144.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 25.3% | 26.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 9.59× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-54.2M | $65.6M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $5.4M | $44.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $162.0K | $10.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-25.1M | $11.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-4.7M | $10.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.9M | $33.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-12.9M | $8.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.1M | $9.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-4.0M | $6.4M |
| Q4 25 | $-4.8M | $37.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-7.5M | $8.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-37.0M | $9.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-4.9M | $10.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.4M | $30.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-15.5M | $7.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.0M | $8.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-4.6M | $5.8M |
| Q4 25 | -11.9% | 144.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | -16.3% | 36.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -77.7% | 38.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -10.9% | 45.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.7% | 143.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -28.0% | 37.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | -4.3% | 49.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | -10.7% | 33.6% |
| Q4 25 | 25.3% | 26.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 16.7% | 8.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 24.9% | 10.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.5% | 3.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 14.5% | 13.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.7% | 3.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.9% | 5.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.5% | 3.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | 9.59× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.87× | ||
| Q2 25 | -77.81× | 3.16× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 5.20× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 7.44× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 7.48× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 12.10× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 31.07× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
MX
| Power Analog Solutions | $36.8M | 91% |
| Power Ic | $3.8M | 9% |
PSTL
Segment breakdown not available.
