vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of MAGNACHIP SEMICONDUCTOR Corp (MX) and P10, Inc. (PX). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
P10, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($81.0M vs $40.6M, roughly 2.0× MAGNACHIP SEMICONDUCTOR Corp). P10, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 11.7% vs -19.9%, a 31.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, P10, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-4.7% vs -20.7%). P10, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($18.1M vs $-4.8M). Over the past eight quarters, P10, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (10.7% CAGR vs -3.4%).
Magnachip Semiconductor Corp is a global semiconductor design and manufacturing firm specializing in high-performance analog and mixed-signal solutions. Its core products include display driver ICs, power management ICs and sensors, serving consumer electronics, automotive, industrial and communications markets worldwide.
P10, Inc. is a global alternative investment management firm that offers a diversified portfolio of investment solutions spanning private equity, private credit, real assets and venture capital. It primarily caters to institutional clients including pension funds, endowments, foundations, and high-net-worth individuals across North America, Europe, and Asia Pacific.
MX vs PX — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $40.6M | $81.0M |
| Net Profit | $-8.1M | $9.5M |
| Gross Margin | 9.3% | — |
| Operating Margin | -26.1% | 31.9% |
| Net Margin | -19.9% | 11.7% |
| Revenue YoY | -20.7% | -4.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | 50.4% | 79.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.23 | $0.08 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $40.6M | $81.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $45.9M | $75.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $47.6M | $72.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $44.7M | $67.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $51.2M | $85.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $55.4M | $74.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $46.4M | $71.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $43.4M | $66.1M |
| Q4 25 | $-8.1M | $9.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-13.1M | $2.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $323.0K | $3.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-8.9M | $4.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-16.3M | $5.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-9.6M | $1.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-13.0M | $7.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-15.4M | $5.0M |
| Q4 25 | 9.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 18.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 20.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 20.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 21.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 21.1% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 14.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | -26.1% | 31.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | -25.1% | 14.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -15.6% | 24.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -14.1% | 16.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -12.5% | 26.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -8.1% | 11.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -12.3% | 23.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -21.6% | 18.3% |
| Q4 25 | -19.9% | 11.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -28.5% | 2.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.7% | 4.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -19.9% | 6.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -31.8% | 6.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | -17.3% | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -28.0% | 9.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | -35.5% | 7.6% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.23 | $0.08 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.36 | $0.02 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.01 | $0.03 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.24 | $0.04 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.44 | $0.05 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.26 | $0.01 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.34 | $0.06 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.40 | $0.04 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $103.8M | $28.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $373.2M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $248.3M | $403.5M |
| Total Assets | $351.5M | $928.3M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.93× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $103.8M | $28.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $108.0M | $40.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $113.3M | $33.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $132.7M | $74.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $138.6M | $67.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $151.1M | $61.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $162.5M | $31.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $171.6M | $29.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | $373.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $393.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $373.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $357.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $319.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $319.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $300.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $314.0M |
| Q4 25 | $248.3M | $403.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $255.3M | $396.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $270.2M | $388.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $269.2M | $374.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $276.8M | $386.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $299.6M | $394.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $305.8M | $396.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $321.9M | $400.1M |
| Q4 25 | $351.5M | $928.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $359.6M | $936.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $370.5M | $932.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $373.9M | $877.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $379.3M | $869.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $411.4M | $857.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $412.7M | $823.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $426.2M | $832.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.93× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.99× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.96× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.95× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.83× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.81× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.76× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.78× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $5.4M | $23.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-4.8M | $18.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -11.9% | 22.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 25.3% | 6.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 2.43× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-54.2M | $14.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $5.4M | $23.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $162.0K | $-8.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-25.1M | $13.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-4.7M | $-4.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.9M | $101.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-12.9M | $27.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.1M | $34.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-4.0M | $11.0M |
| Q4 25 | $-4.8M | $18.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-7.5M | $-9.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-37.0M | $11.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-4.9M | $-6.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.4M | $96.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-15.5M | $25.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.0M | $33.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-4.6M | $10.7M |
| Q4 25 | -11.9% | 22.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -16.3% | -12.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -77.7% | 15.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -10.9% | -8.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.7% | 113.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -28.0% | 34.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -4.3% | 47.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -10.7% | 16.2% |
| Q4 25 | 25.3% | 6.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 16.7% | 1.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 24.9% | 2.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.5% | 1.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 14.5% | 5.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.7% | 3.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.9% | 1.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.5% | 0.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | 2.43× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -4.01× | ||
| Q2 25 | -77.81× | 3.96× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -1.05× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 19.12× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 19.54× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 4.98× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.18× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
MX
| Power Analog Solutions | $36.8M | 91% |
| Power Ic | $3.8M | 9% |
PX
| Management Fees | $78.1M | 96% |
| Advisory Fees | $1.8M | 2% |
