vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Nano Labs Ltd (NA) and OLB GROUP, INC. (OLB). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Nano Labs Ltd is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.7M vs $1.8M, roughly 1.5× OLB GROUP, INC.). Nano Labs Ltd runs the higher net margin — 754.5% vs -83.7%, a 838.2% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Weebit Nano is a public semiconductor IP company founded in Israel in 2015 and headquartered in Hod HaSharon, Israel. The company develops Resistive Random-Access Memory technologies. Resistive Random-Access Memory is a specialized form of non-volatile memory (NVM) for the semiconductor industry. The company's products are targeted at a broad range of NVM markets where persistence, performance, and endurance are all required. ReRAM technology can be integrated in electronic devices like weara...
OLB Group, Inc. is a global financial technology provider offering omnichannel payment processing solutions, e-commerce enablement tools, and digital banking services for small and medium-sized enterprises across North America, Europe, and key Asia-Pacific markets. Its core segments include merchant services, crypto payment integration, and cloud-based business management platforms.
NA vs OLB — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.7M | $1.8M |
| Net Profit | $20.3M | $-1.5M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | — | -83.7% |
| Net Margin | 754.5% | -83.7% |
| Revenue YoY | — | -35.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 67.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.03 | $-0.48 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $2.7M | $1.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2M | $2.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $3.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.5M | $3.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $3.5M |
| Q4 25 | $20.3M | $-1.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-1.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-985.5K | $-2.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-1.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-4.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-1.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-8.0M | $-2.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-2.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.1% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | -83.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -49.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -459.2% | -74.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -36.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -166.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -52.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -237.2% | -74.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -82.6% |
| Q4 25 | 754.5% | -83.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -50.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -85.2% | -93.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -46.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -167.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -52.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -231.3% | -75.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -67.8% |
| Q4 25 | $1.03 | $-0.48 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-0.13 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.06 | $-0.66 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-0.47 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-3.55 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-0.92 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.12 | $-1.49 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-0.14 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $4.9M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $24.5M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $106.5M | $4.6M |
| Total Assets | $159.3M | $12.3M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.23× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $4.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $50.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $29.3K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $27.4K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $41.3K | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.3M | $53.3K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $3.3K |
| Q4 25 | $24.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $24.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $22.5M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $106.5M | $4.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $5.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $86.8M | $6.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $6.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-5.1M | $8.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $11.0M |
| Q4 25 | $159.3M | $12.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $12.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $206.4M | $12.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $12.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $12.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $15.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $51.2M | $16.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $18.3M |
| Q4 25 | 0.23× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.29× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-8.3M | $-1.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-8.4M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -312.3% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.9% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -0.41× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-8.3M | $-1.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-115.5K | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.1M | $-1.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-155.8K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-2.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-376.7K | ||
| Q2 24 | $-10.8M | $-785.5K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-424.7K |
| Q4 25 | $-8.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-15.4M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | -312.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -620.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -443.4% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | 2.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 133.1% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | -0.41× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
NA
Segment breakdown not available.
OLB
| Transaction And Processing Fees | $1.7M | 94% |
| Other | $99.2K | 6% |
