vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Nakamoto Inc. (NAKA) and SenesTech, Inc. (SNES). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Nakamoto Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($444.9K vs $421.0K, roughly 1.1× SenesTech, Inc.). Nakamoto Inc. runs the higher net margin — 8374.2% vs -428.5%, a 8802.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, SenesTech, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-16.0% vs -26.3%). Over the past eight quarters, SenesTech, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (0.7% CAGR vs -26.7%).
SenesTech, Inc. is an agricultural biotechnology life-sciences company, specializing in fertility management as a form of pest control. The company's primary product, ContraPest is designed to make brown and black rats infertile. SenesTech is headquartered in Phoenix, Arizona.
NAKA vs SNES — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $444.9K | $421.0K |
| Net Profit | $37.3M | $-1.8M |
| Gross Margin | — | 55.3% |
| Operating Margin | -41198.2% | -446.8% |
| Net Margin | 8374.2% | -428.5% |
| Revenue YoY | -26.3% | -16.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | 3820.2% | -43.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.68 | $0.48 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $444.9K | $421.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $388.2K | $690.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $408.5K | $625.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $579.7K | $485.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $603.9K | $501.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $647.9K | $482.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $639.1K | $459.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $829.0K | $415.0K |
| Q4 25 | $37.3M | $-1.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-86.0M | $-1.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.4M | $-1.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.0M | $-1.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.0M | $-1.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.0M | $-1.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.3M | $-1.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-282.3K | $-1.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | 55.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 62.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 65.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 64.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 60.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 65.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 54.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 32.5% |
| Q4 25 | -41198.2% | -446.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -2680.4% | -195.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -585.4% | -258.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -179.7% | -342.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | -169.3% | -250.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -162.0% | -321.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -162.3% | -349.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | -28.6% | -444.1% |
| Q4 25 | 8374.2% | -428.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | -22162.2% | -188.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -590.9% | -258.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -179.1% | -343.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | -165.8% | -250.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -156.5% | -313.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -206.5% | -345.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | -34.1% | -441.4% |
| Q4 25 | $0.68 | $0.48 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.42 | $-0.28 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.35 | $-0.87 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.17 | $-1.28 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.18 | $-0.15 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.17 | $-2.07 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.26 | $-3.08 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.06 | $-3.56 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $22.6M | $8.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $514.3M | $9.6M |
| Total Assets | $730.6M | $12.8M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $22.6M | $8.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $24.2M | $10.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.0M | $6.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1M | $1.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.3M | $1.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.6M | $2.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.7M | $2.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $287.4K | $3.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $64.4K | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $148.8K | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $205.6K | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $254.7K | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $710.0K | — |
| Q4 25 | $514.3M | $9.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $477.6M | $11.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.0M | $7.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.5M | $2.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.6M | $2.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.5M | $3.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.4M | $3.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-383.1K | $4.6M |
| Q4 25 | $730.6M | $12.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $692.4M | $14.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.9M | $10.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.6M | $3.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.7M | $3.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.3M | $4.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.5M | $4.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $799.3K | $5.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.04× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.06× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.06× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.06× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-23.5M | $-1.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-1.7M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -398.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 3.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -0.63× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-5.9M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-23.5M | $-1.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-13.2M | $-1.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.9M | $-1.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-865.1K | $-1.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-3.1M | $-1.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.0M | $-1.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-913.5K | $-1.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-213.4K | $-1.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-1.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-1.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-1.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-1.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-3.1M | $-1.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.0M | $-1.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-1.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-224.6K | $-1.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | -398.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -205.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -191.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -328.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -511.2% | -246.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -161.7% | -296.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -354.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | -27.1% | -441.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | 3.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 6.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 7.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 7.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.2% | 3.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.3% | 5.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.0% | 8.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.3% | 0.5% |
| Q4 25 | -0.63× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
