vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Namib Minerals (NAMM) and Nayax Ltd. (NYAX). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Nayax Ltd. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($78.1M vs $41.9M, roughly 1.9× Namib Minerals).
Namib Minerals is a Namibia-based natural resources firm focused on exploration, development and extraction of high-demand mineral deposits including uranium, copper and lithium. It operates across licensed southern African sites, supplying raw materials to global clean energy, construction and electronics manufacturing sectors.
Nayax Ltd. is a global fintech company that offers cashless, telemetry, management, monitoring, and business intelligence (BI) products and services for the vending, unattended, and other retail industries.
NAMM vs NYAX — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2024
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $41.9M | $78.1M |
| Net Profit | — | $-3.0M |
| Gross Margin | 45.7% | 44.3% |
| Operating Margin | 29.8% | 1.2% |
| Net Margin | — | -3.9% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 39.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 24.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $-0.08 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q2 25 | $41.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $78.1M | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $56.2M |
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-3.0M | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $-4.0M |
| Q2 25 | 45.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 44.3% | ||
| Q2 23 | — | 37.1% |
| Q2 25 | 29.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.2% | ||
| Q2 23 | — | -6.6% |
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -3.9% | ||
| Q2 23 | — | -7.1% |
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-0.08 | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $-0.12 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $61.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $158.7M |
| Total Assets | — | $434.7M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $61.9M | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $31.1M |
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $158.7M | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $100.0M |
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $434.7M | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $261.8M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $11.4M | $9.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $7.4M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 17.6% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 9.6% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q2 25 | $11.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $9.2M | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $-1.7M |
| Q2 25 | $7.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — |
| Q2 25 | 17.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — |
| Q2 25 | 9.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
