vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Namib Minerals (NAMM) and SILICOM LTD. (SILC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
SILICOM LTD. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($61.9M vs $41.9M, roughly 1.5× Namib Minerals). Namib Minerals produced more free cash flow last quarter ($7.4M vs $-3.3M).
Namib Minerals is a Namibia-based natural resources firm focused on exploration, development and extraction of high-demand mineral deposits including uranium, copper and lithium. It operates across licensed southern African sites, supplying raw materials to global clean energy, construction and electronics manufacturing sectors.
Silicom Ltd. is a publicly traded company, headquartered in Israel, that specializes in the design, manufacture and marketing of connectivity solutions for a range of servers and server-based systems. Its shares are listed on the NASDAQ Global Market and on the Tel Aviv Stock Exchange. Silicom is a member of the RAD Group family of companies.
NAMM vs SILC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $41.9M | $61.9M |
| Net Profit | — | $-11.5M |
| Gross Margin | 45.7% | 30.6% |
| Operating Margin | 29.8% | -19.8% |
| Net Margin | — | -18.5% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 6.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 16.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $-2.01 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $61.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $41.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $58.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-11.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-13.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | 30.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 45.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 28.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | -19.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 29.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -22.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | -18.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -23.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | $-2.01 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-2.28 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $42.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $117.5M |
| Total Assets | — | $152.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $42.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $72.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | $117.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $127.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | $152.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $150.4M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $11.4M | $-2.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $7.4M | $-3.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 17.6% | -5.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 9.6% | 1.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $-2.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $18.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-3.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $17.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | -5.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 17.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 29.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.6% |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
