vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Namib Minerals (NAMM) and SOLENO THERAPEUTICS INC (SLNO). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
SOLENO THERAPEUTICS INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($66.0M vs $41.9M, roughly 1.6× Namib Minerals). SOLENO THERAPEUTICS INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($43.5M vs $7.4M).
Namib Minerals is a Namibia-based natural resources firm focused on exploration, development and extraction of high-demand mineral deposits including uranium, copper and lithium. It operates across licensed southern African sites, supplying raw materials to global clean energy, construction and electronics manufacturing sectors.
SOLENO THERAPEUTICS INC is a clinical-stage biopharmaceutical company specializing in developing novel therapies for rare endocrine, metabolic, and neurodevelopmental disorders. Its lead product candidate targets Prader-Willi syndrome, a rare genetic condition, with key patient markets across North America and the European Union.
NAMM vs SLNO — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $41.9M | $66.0M |
| Net Profit | — | $26.0M |
| Gross Margin | 45.7% | 98.3% |
| Operating Margin | 29.8% | 33.5% |
| Net Margin | — | 39.4% |
| Revenue YoY | — | — |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 134.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $0.47 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q3 25 | — | $66.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $41.9M | $32.7M |
| Q3 25 | — | $26.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-4.7M |
| Q3 25 | — | 98.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 45.7% | 97.9% |
| Q3 25 | — | 33.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 29.8% | -20.0% |
| Q3 25 | — | 39.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -14.4% |
| Q3 25 | — | $0.47 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-0.09 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $498.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $494.8M |
| Total Assets | — | $599.9M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | — | $498.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $286.8M |
| Q3 25 | — | $494.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $240.1M |
| Q3 25 | — | $599.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $332.3M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $11.4M | $43.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $7.4M | $43.5M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 17.6% | 65.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 9.6% | 0.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.67× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | — | $43.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.4M | $-12.6M |
| Q3 25 | — | $43.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.4M | $-12.6M |
| Q3 25 | — | 65.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 17.6% | -38.6% |
| Q3 25 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.6% | 0.0% |
| Q3 25 | — | 1.67× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
