vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Namib Minerals (NAMM) and YY Group Holding Ltd. (YYGH). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Namib Minerals is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($41.9M vs $25.8M, roughly 1.6× YY Group Holding Ltd.). Namib Minerals produced more free cash flow last quarter ($7.4M vs $-2.6M).
Namib Minerals is a Namibia-based natural resources firm focused on exploration, development and extraction of high-demand mineral deposits including uranium, copper and lithium. It operates across licensed southern African sites, supplying raw materials to global clean energy, construction and electronics manufacturing sectors.
YY Group Holding Ltd is a China-headquartered digital entertainment platform operator. It mainly provides live streaming services covering diverse content categories including talent performances, gaming, music and lifestyle, primarily serving users in mainland China and selected Southeast Asian overseas markets. It also operates interactive social functions to boost user engagement on its platforms.
NAMM vs YYGH — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $41.9M | $25.8M |
| Net Profit | — | — |
| Gross Margin | 45.7% | 9.2% |
| Operating Margin | 29.8% | — |
| Net Margin | — | — |
| Revenue YoY | — | — |
| Net Profit YoY | — | — |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $38506507.00 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q2 25 | $41.9M | $25.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $13.7M |
| Q2 25 | 45.7% | 9.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 13.1% |
| Q2 25 | 29.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.4% |
| Q2 25 | — | $38506507.00 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $11.4M | $-2.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $7.4M | $-2.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 17.6% | -10.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 9.6% | 0.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q2 25 | $11.4M | $-2.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q2 25 | $7.4M | $-2.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q2 25 | 17.6% | -10.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q2 25 | 9.6% | 0.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
NAMM
Segment breakdown not available.
YYGH
| Segment revenue | $19.3M | 75% |
| Other | $5.3M | 21% |
| Other income | $1.2M | 5% |
