vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Namib Minerals (NAMM) and Zevia PBC (ZVIA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Namib Minerals is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($41.9M vs $37.9M, roughly 1.1× Zevia PBC).
Namib Minerals is a Namibia-based natural resources firm focused on exploration, development and extraction of high-demand mineral deposits including uranium, copper and lithium. It operates across licensed southern African sites, supplying raw materials to global clean energy, construction and electronics manufacturing sectors.
Zevia is a Los Angeles based company that produces soft drinks, organic tea, energy drinks, and mixers sweetened with stevia. All Zevia products are zero-calorie, sugar-free, gluten free, vegan, certified kosher, and certified by The Non-GMO Project. In June 2021, Zevia filed to go public with an IPO.
NAMM vs ZVIA — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $41.9M | $37.9M |
| Net Profit | — | $-1.3M |
| Gross Margin | 45.7% | 47.7% |
| Operating Margin | 29.8% | -4.0% |
| Net Margin | — | -3.4% |
| Revenue YoY | — | -4.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 80.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $-0.02 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $37.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $40.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $41.9M | $44.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $38.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $39.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $36.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $40.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $38.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-1.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-2.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-651.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-6.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-6.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-2.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-7.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-7.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | 47.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 45.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 45.7% | 48.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 50.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 49.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 49.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 41.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 45.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | -4.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -7.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 29.8% | -2.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -16.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -16.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -8.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -17.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -18.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | -3.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -6.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -1.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -16.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -17.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -6.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -17.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -18.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | $-0.02 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-0.04 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-0.01 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-0.08 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-0.10 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-0.04 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-0.10 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-0.10 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $25.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $51.0M |
| Total Assets | — | $63.6M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $25.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $26.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $30.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $51.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $51.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $53.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $53.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $64.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $72.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $75.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $80.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | $63.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $60.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $62.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $62.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $68.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $72.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $72.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $85.1M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $11.4M | $-507.0K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $7.4M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 17.6% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 9.6% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $-507.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $116.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.4M | $-1.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-2.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-2.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $3.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $282.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-3.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 17.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
