vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of NCR Atleos Corp (NATL) and SM Energy Co (SM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
NCR Atleos Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.2B vs $704.9M, roughly 1.6× SM Energy Co). On growth, NCR Atleos Corp posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (4.0% vs -17.3%). Over the past eight quarters, SM Energy Co's revenue compounded faster (12.2% CAGR vs 4.9%).
NCR Voyix Corporation, previously known as NCR Corporation and National Cash Register, is a global software, consulting and technology company providing several professional services and electronic products. It manufactured self-service kiosks, point-of-sale terminals, automated teller machines, check processing systems, and barcode scanners.
SM Energy Company is a company engaged in hydrocarbon exploration. It is organized in Delaware and headquartered in Denver, Colorado.
NATL vs SM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.2B | $704.9M |
| Net Profit | $83.0M | — |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 13.5% | 25.9% |
| Net Margin | 7.2% | — |
| Revenue YoY | 4.0% | -17.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | 102.4% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.09 | $0.94 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | $704.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | $811.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $792.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $979.0M | $844.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $852.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | $643.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | $634.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.0B | $559.9M |
| Q4 25 | $83.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $26.0M | $155.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $39.0M | $201.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $14.0M | $182.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $41.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $21.0M | $240.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $27.0M | $210.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-9.0M | $131.2M |
| Q4 25 | 13.5% | 25.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.8% | 30.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.8% | 37.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.5% | 32.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.4% | 33.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.6% | 51.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.8% | 44.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.5% | 31.9% |
| Q4 25 | 7.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.3% | 19.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.5% | 25.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.4% | 21.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.0% | 37.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.5% | 33.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | -0.9% | 23.4% |
| Q4 25 | $1.09 | $0.94 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.34 | $1.35 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.52 | $1.76 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.19 | $1.59 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.56 | $1.63 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.28 | $2.09 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.37 | $1.82 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.13 | $1.13 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $456.0M | $368.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $2.7B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $403.0M | $4.8B |
| Total Assets | $5.7B | $9.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 6.63× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $456.0M | $368.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $412.0M | $162.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $357.0M | $101.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $352.0M | $54.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $419.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $395.0M | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $374.0M | $487.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $343.0M | $506.3M |
| Q4 25 | $2.7B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.8B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.8B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.9B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $403.0M | $4.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $330.0M | $4.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $350.0M | $4.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $275.0M | $4.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $219.0M | $4.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $264.0M | $4.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $250.0M | $3.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | $283.0M | $3.7B |
| Q4 25 | $5.7B | $9.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.7B | $9.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.8B | $9.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.7B | $8.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.5B | $8.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.7B | $8.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.8B | $6.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.8B | $6.4B |
| Q4 25 | 6.63× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.45× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.05× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.05× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $231.0M | $451.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $194.0M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 16.8% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.2% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 2.78× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $239.0M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $231.0M | $451.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $25.0M | $505.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-23.0M | $571.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $123.0M | $483.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $80.0M | $578.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $107.0M | $452.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.0M | $476.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $148.0M | $276.0M |
| Q4 25 | $194.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-5.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-44.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $94.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $62.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $85.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-14.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $124.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | 16.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -0.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -4.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -1.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 11.9% | — |
| Q4 25 | 3.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.1% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | 2.78× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.96× | 3.26× | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.59× | 2.83× | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.79× | 2.65× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.95× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.10× | 1.88× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.33× | 2.27× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.10× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
NATL
| Services | $848.0M | 74% |
| APJ | $136.0M | 12% |
| Americas Excluding United States | $135.0M | 12% |
| TT | $44.0M | 4% |
SM
Segment breakdown not available.
