vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Navan, Inc. (NAVN) and BRC Group Holdings, Inc. (RILY). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Navan, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($194.9M vs $188.3M, roughly 1.0× BRC Group Holdings, Inc.). BRC Group Holdings, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 47.9% vs -115.6%, a 163.6% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Navan, Inc. is an American corporate travel and expense management company headquartered in Palo Alto, California. Founded in May 2015 by Ariel Cohen and Ilan Twig, Navan offers an integrated platform combining travel booking, corporate-issued payment cards, expense reporting, and analytics for businesses worldwide.
NAVN vs RILY — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $194.9M | $188.3M |
| Net Profit | $-225.4M | $90.3M |
| Gross Margin | 70.7% | 79.5% |
| Operating Margin | -40.6% | 32.3% |
| Net Margin | -115.6% | 47.9% |
| Revenue YoY | — | -21.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | -483.6% | 1710.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-4.58 | $2.78 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $194.9M | $188.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $215.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $188.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $197.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $241.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $225.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $256.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $263.4M |
| Q4 25 | $-225.4M | $90.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $91.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $139.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-10.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-5.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-284.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-433.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-49.2M |
| Q4 25 | 70.7% | 79.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 83.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 81.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 81.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 79.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 82.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 84.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 85.3% |
| Q4 25 | -40.6% | 32.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 30.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 5.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -31.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -69.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -36.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -90.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -6.1% |
| Q4 25 | -115.6% | 47.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 42.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 74.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -5.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -2.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -126.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -169.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -18.7% |
| Q4 25 | $-4.58 | $2.78 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.91 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $4.50 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-0.39 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-0.01 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-9.39 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-14.35 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-1.71 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $809.1M | $226.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $206.6M | $1.4B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.2B | $-171.5M |
| Total Assets | $1.8B | $1.7B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.17× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $809.1M | $226.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $184.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $267.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $138.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $146.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $159.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $236.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $190.7M |
| Q4 25 | $206.6M | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | $-171.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-260.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-351.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-496.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-488.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-497.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-218.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $228.4M |
| Q4 25 | $1.8B | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $3.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $5.0B |
| Q4 25 | 0.17× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-1.3M | $26.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-1.9M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -1.0% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.3% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 0.29× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-1.3M | $26.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-60.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-25.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $184.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-2.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $19.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $111.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $135.4M |
| Q4 25 | $-1.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | -1.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.29× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -0.66× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -0.18× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
NAVN
| Usage Based Revenue | $179.9M | 92% |
| Subscription Revenue | $15.0M | 8% |
RILY
| Transferred At Point In Time | $101.4M | 54% |
| Wealth Management Segment | $30.7M | 16% |
| Corporate Finance Consulting And Investment Banking Fees | $27.1M | 14% |
| Services And Fees | $24.8M | 13% |
| Commissions Fees And Reimbursed Expenses | $4.8M | 3% |
