vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of New Fortress Energy Inc. (NFE) and Service Properties Trust (SVC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
New Fortress Energy Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($326.2M vs $296.5M, roughly 1.1× Service Properties Trust). Service Properties Trust runs the higher net margin — -0.3% vs -259.7%, a 259.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, New Fortress Energy Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-7.0% vs -17.0%). Service Properties Trust produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-95.2M vs $-134.8M). Over the past eight quarters, Service Properties Trust's revenue compounded faster (-6.1% CAGR vs -26.8%).
New Fortress Energy Inc. is a global energy infrastructure firm developing, owning and operating LNG import/export terminals, natural gas supply networks and low-carbon projects. It serves utility, industrial and public sector clients across the Americas and Caribbean, delivering affordable, lower-emission energy resources.
Medical Properties Trust, Inc. (MPT) is an international real estate investment trust (REIT) based in Birmingham, Alabama that purchases and invests in healthcare facilities and for-profit healthcare holding companies, primarily in the United States and Europe. Their property acquisitions often come in the form of sale-leaseback agreements, in which the original property owner sells the property to MPT and becomes their tenant. MPT's tenants are generally subject to long-term triple net lease...
NFE vs SVC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $326.2M | $296.5M |
| Net Profit | $-847.1M | $-782.0K |
| Gross Margin | 35.5% | — |
| Operating Margin | -193.0% | -3.9% |
| Net Margin | -259.7% | -0.3% |
| Revenue YoY | -7.0% | -17.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | -277.4% | 99.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-3.03 | $-0.01 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $326.2M | $296.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $240.3M | $377.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $228.1M | $404.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $384.9M | $335.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $350.7M | $357.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $446.0M | $390.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $291.2M | $412.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $609.5M | $336.2M |
| Q4 25 | $-847.1M | $-782.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $-263.0M | $-46.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-546.5M | $-38.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-175.4M | $-116.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-224.4M | $-76.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.3M | $-46.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-88.9M | $-73.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $54.1M | $-78.4M |
| Q4 25 | 35.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 18.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 21.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 17.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 27.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 23.8% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 62.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | -193.0% | -3.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | -37.4% | -12.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -170.3% | -9.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -3.3% | -33.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 65.0% | -19.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 17.8% | -12.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.3% | -17.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 30.4% | -21.4% |
| Q4 25 | -259.7% | -0.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -109.4% | -12.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -239.6% | -9.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -45.6% | -34.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -64.0% | -21.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.1% | -12.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -30.5% | -17.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.9% | -23.3% |
| Q4 25 | $-3.03 | $-0.01 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.96 | $-0.28 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.99 | $-0.23 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.65 | $-0.70 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.10 | $-0.46 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.03 | $-0.28 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.42 | $-0.45 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.23 | $-0.48 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $226.5M | $346.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $8.2B | $5.5B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $182.6M | $646.1M |
| Total Assets | $10.6B | $6.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 44.78× | 8.52× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $226.5M | $346.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $145.2M | $417.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $551.1M | $63.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $447.9M | $80.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $492.9M | $143.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $90.8M | $48.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $133.0M | $14.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $143.5M | $71.3M |
| Q4 25 | $8.2B | $5.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.9B | $5.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $182.6M | $646.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | $647.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | $695.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.8B | $734.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.9B | $851.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6B | $929.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6B | $1.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.7B | $1.1B |
| Q4 25 | $10.6B | $6.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.0B | $7.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.0B | $6.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $13.1B | $7.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $12.9B | $7.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.0B | $7.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.4B | $7.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $10.9B | $7.2B |
| Q4 25 | 44.78× | 8.52× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.74× | 6.85× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-76.2M | $-18.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-134.8M | $-95.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -41.3% | -32.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 18.0% | 25.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-1.4B | $-107.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-76.2M | $-18.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-171.0M | $98.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-329.0M | $-7.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-7.2M | $38.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $445.3M | $-9.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-20.0M | $106.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $113.9M | $43.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $63.0M | $-926.0K |
| Q4 25 | $-134.8M | $-95.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-231.6M | $57.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-726.7M | $-46.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-262.3M | $-23.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-210.3M | $-88.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-367.0M | $24.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-493.2M | $-22.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-457.9M | $-77.2M |
| Q4 25 | -41.3% | -32.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -96.4% | 15.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -318.6% | -11.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -68.2% | -6.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | -60.0% | -24.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -82.3% | 6.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | -169.3% | -5.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | -75.1% | -23.0% |
| Q4 25 | 18.0% | 25.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 25.2% | 10.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 174.4% | 11.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 66.3% | 18.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 187.0% | 22.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 77.8% | 21.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 208.4% | 16.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 85.5% | 22.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.15× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.16× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
