vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Nano Dimension Ltd. (NNDM) and OLAPLEX HOLDINGS, INC. (OLPX). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
OLAPLEX HOLDINGS, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($105.1M vs $57.8M, roughly 1.8× Nano Dimension Ltd.). OLAPLEX HOLDINGS, INC. runs the higher net margin — -12.5% vs -171.1%, a 158.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. OLAPLEX HOLDINGS, INC. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($32.6M vs $-21.1M).
Nano Dimension Ltd. is a leading provider of additively manufactured electronics solutions and 3D printing technologies. It designs high-precision 3D printers, related materials, and software for producing printed circuit boards, microelectronics components, and multi-layer electronic devices, serving aerospace, defense, medical, automotive, and industrial electronics segments across global markets.
Olaplex Holdings, Inc. is a specialty beauty company developing and selling patented bond-repair hair care products. It runs three core segments: professional salon distribution, direct-to-consumer sales, and third-party retail, serving customers across North America, Europe, and Asia-Pacific with products that repair and protect damaged hair.
NNDM vs OLPX — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2024 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $57.8M | $105.1M |
| Net Profit | $-98.8M | $-13.1M |
| Gross Margin | 43.1% | 68.0% |
| Operating Margin | -155.1% | -4.3% |
| Net Margin | -171.1% | -12.5% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 4.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | -48.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.45 | $-0.02 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $105.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $114.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $106.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $97.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $57.8M | $100.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $119.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $28.4M | $103.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $98.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-13.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $11.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-7.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $465.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $-98.8M | $-8.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $14.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-79.2M | $5.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $7.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | 68.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 69.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 71.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 69.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 43.1% | 66.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 68.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 45.8% | 69.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 72.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | -4.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -1.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 8.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -155.1% | 3.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 23.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 15.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 19.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | -12.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 9.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -7.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -171.1% | -8.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 12.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -279.4% | 5.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 7.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | $-0.02 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.02 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-0.01 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.00 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.45 | $-0.01 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.02 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.35 | $0.01 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $0.01 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $317.2M | $318.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $352.3M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $860.0M | $879.4M |
| Total Assets | $902.5M | $1.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.40× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $318.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $286.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $289.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $580.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $317.2M | $586.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $538.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $231.8M | $507.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $507.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | $352.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $352.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $351.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $649.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $650.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $651.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $653.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $654.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | $879.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $888.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $874.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $878.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $860.0M | $874.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $879.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $870.3M | $863.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $855.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $902.5M | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $911.0M | $1.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.8B |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.40× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.40× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.40× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.74× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.74× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.74× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.76× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.76× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-18.9M | $32.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-21.1M | $32.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -36.5% | 31.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.8% | 0.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $58.3M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $32.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $8.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $20.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-2.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-18.9M | $49.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $33.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-30.7M | $16.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $43.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | $32.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $7.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $20.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-3.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-21.1M | $49.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $33.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $16.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $43.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | 31.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 6.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 19.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -3.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -36.5% | 48.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 28.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 15.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 43.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.8% | 0.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.72× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -6.27× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.26× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.81× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 5.64× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
NNDM
Segment breakdown not available.
OLPX
| Sales Channel Directly To Consumer | $43.6M | 42% |
| Sales Channel Through Intermediary Professional | $36.8M | 35% |
| Sales Channel Through Intermediary Specialty Retail | $24.7M | 23% |
