vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Nano Dimension Ltd. (NNDM) and Plymouth Industrial REIT, Inc. (PLYM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Nano Dimension Ltd. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($57.8M vs $51.2M, roughly 1.1× Plymouth Industrial REIT, Inc.). Plymouth Industrial REIT, Inc. runs the higher net margin — -106.3% vs -171.1%, a 64.8% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Nano Dimension Ltd. is a leading provider of additively manufactured electronics solutions and 3D printing technologies. It designs high-precision 3D printers, related materials, and software for producing printed circuit boards, microelectronics components, and multi-layer electronic devices, serving aerospace, defense, medical, automotive, and industrial electronics segments across global markets.
Plymouth Industrial REIT, Inc. is a real estate investment trust focused on owning, operating, and acquiring high-quality industrial properties including distribution centers, warehouses, and light industrial facilities across key U.S. logistics hubs. It serves tenants in e-commerce, retail, manufacturing, and third-party logistics sectors, supporting diverse business supply chain needs.
NNDM vs PLYM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2024 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $57.8M | $51.2M |
| Net Profit | $-98.8M | $-54.4M |
| Gross Margin | 43.1% | — |
| Operating Margin | -155.1% | -102.5% |
| Net Margin | -171.1% | -106.3% |
| Revenue YoY | — | -1.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | -248.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.45 | $-1.23 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q3 25 | — | $51.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $47.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $45.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $57.8M | $47.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $51.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $28.4M | $48.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $50.2M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $50.8M |
| Q3 25 | — | $-54.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-6.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $5.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-98.8M | $147.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-15.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-79.2M | $1.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $6.2M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $9.3M |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 43.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 45.8% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | — | -102.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -10.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -155.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -29.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | — | -106.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -12.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 12.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -171.1% | 309.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -30.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -279.4% | 2.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 12.4% | ||
| Q4 23 | — | 18.3% |
| Q3 25 | — | $-1.23 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-0.14 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.13 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.45 | $3.24 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-0.35 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.35 | $0.03 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $0.14 | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $0.21 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $317.2M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $860.0M | $470.1M |
| Total Assets | $902.5M | $1.6B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $317.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $231.8M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $646.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $873.4M |
| Q3 25 | — | $470.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $539.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $571.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $860.0M | $579.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $436.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $870.3M | $475.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $484.6M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $483.0M |
| Q3 25 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $902.5M | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $911.0M | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $1.4B |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.12× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | 1.81× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-18.9M | $20.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-21.1M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -36.5% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.8% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | — | $20.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $23.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $15.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-18.9M | $96.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $17.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-30.7M | $19.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $16.6M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $18.6M |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-21.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -36.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.67× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.65× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 15.12× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.67× | ||
| Q4 23 | — | 2.01× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
