vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Nano Dimension Ltd. (NNDM) and TRICO BANCSHARES (TCBK). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
TRICO BANCSHARES is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($109.4M vs $57.8M, roughly 1.9× Nano Dimension Ltd.). TRICO BANCSHARES runs the higher net margin — 251.6% vs -171.1%, a 422.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. TRICO BANCSHARES produced more free cash flow last quarter ($127.9M vs $-21.1M).
Nano Dimension Ltd. is a leading provider of additively manufactured electronics solutions and 3D printing technologies. It designs high-precision 3D printers, related materials, and software for producing printed circuit boards, microelectronics components, and multi-layer electronic devices, serving aerospace, defense, medical, automotive, and industrial electronics segments across global markets.
Trico Bancshares is a U.S.-headquartered regional bank holding company operating Tri Counties Bank. It offers a full range of retail and commercial banking services including deposit products, mortgages, small business loans, and wealth management, primarily serving consumers and SMEs in Northern California.
NNDM vs TCBK — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2024 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $57.8M | $109.4M |
| Net Profit | $-98.8M | $33.6M |
| Gross Margin | 43.1% | — |
| Operating Margin | -155.1% | 42.6% |
| Net Margin | -171.1% | 251.6% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 9.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 15.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.45 | $1.02 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $109.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $107.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $103.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $98.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $57.8M | $100.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $99.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $28.4M | $97.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $98.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | $33.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $34.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $27.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $26.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-98.8M | $29.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $29.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-79.2M | $29.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $27.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 43.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 45.8% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 42.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 43.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 36.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 35.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -155.1% | 38.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 39.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 40.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 38.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | 251.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 31.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 26.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 26.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -171.1% | 221.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 29.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -279.4% | 29.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 28.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | $1.02 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.04 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.84 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.80 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.45 | $0.88 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.88 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.35 | $0.87 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $0.83 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $317.2M | $157.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $860.0M | $1.3B |
| Total Assets | $902.5M | $9.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $157.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $298.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $314.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $308.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $317.2M | $145.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $320.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $231.8M | $206.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $82.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $860.0M | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $870.3M | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.2B |
| Q4 25 | — | $9.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $9.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $9.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $9.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $902.5M | $9.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $9.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $911.0M | $9.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $9.8B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-18.9M | $133.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-21.1M | $127.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -36.5% | 116.9% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.8% | 4.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 3.96× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $222.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $133.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $45.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $29.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $24.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-18.9M | $109.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $28.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-30.7M | $31.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $25.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | $127.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $43.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $28.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $22.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-21.1M | $105.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $27.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $30.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $24.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | 116.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 40.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 27.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 23.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -36.5% | 104.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 27.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 31.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 24.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | 4.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.8% | 4.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | 3.96× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.33× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.06× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.93× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.78× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.98× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.10× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.90× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
