vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Neptune Insurance Holdings Inc. (NP) and SANDRIDGE ENERGY INC (SD). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
SANDRIDGE ENERGY INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($39.4M vs $37.8M, roughly 1.0× Neptune Insurance Holdings Inc.). SANDRIDGE ENERGY INC runs the higher net margin — 54.9% vs 0.1%, a 54.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Neptune Insurance Holdings Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (28.8% vs 1.1%).
Neptune Insurance Holdings Inc. is a specialty insurance holding company that offers a broad portfolio of property and casualty insurance products, with a core focus on residential and commercial flood insurance for customers across the United States. It serves both individual consumers and small to mid-sized business clients, using advanced data analytics to support accurate policy pricing and robust risk management.
SandRidge Energy, Inc. is a company engaged in hydrocarbon exploration in the Mid-Continent region of the United States. It is organized in Delaware and headquartered in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma.
NP vs SD — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $37.8M | $39.4M |
| Net Profit | $50.0K | $21.6M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | — | 38.5% |
| Net Margin | 0.1% | 54.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 28.8% | 1.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | 0.0% | 23.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.05 | $0.59 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $37.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $39.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $44.4M | $39.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $34.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $42.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $39.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $33.8M | $30.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $26.0M |
| Q1 26 | $50.0K | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $21.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.5M | $16.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $19.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $13.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $17.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.1M | $25.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $8.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 38.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 46.7% | 37.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 53.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 28.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 25.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 58.6% | 28.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 23.9% |
| Q1 26 | 0.1% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 54.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 25.9% | 40.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 56.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 30.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 45.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 35.8% | 84.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 33.9% |
| Q1 26 | $0.05 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $0.59 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.06 | $0.43 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.53 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.35 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.46 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.06 | $0.69 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.24 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $111.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $510.9M |
| Total Assets | — | $644.0M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $111.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.2M | $101.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $102.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $99.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $98.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $92.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $209.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $247.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $510.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-509.5M | $492.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $480.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $464.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $460.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-374.3M | $446.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $424.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $644.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $89.6M | $619.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $602.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $588.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $581.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $565.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $529.6M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $31.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $14.4M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 36.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 43.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.46× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $41.5M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $31.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $38.9M | $25.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $22.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $20.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $26.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $20.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $11.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $14.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $5.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $7.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $13.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $13.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $10.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $9.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 36.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 14.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 21.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 32.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 33.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 36.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 34.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 43.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 48.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 45.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 15.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 32.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 33.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 9.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 1.46× | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.38× | 1.58× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.17× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.56× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.48× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.82× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.30× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
NP
Segment breakdown not available.
SD
| Oil Reserves | $19.0M | 48% |
| Natural Gas Reserves | $11.6M | 30% |
| Natural Gas Liquids Reserves | $8.7M | 22% |
