vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Neptune Insurance Holdings Inc. (NP) and SILICOM LTD. (SILC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
SILICOM LTD. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($61.9M vs $37.8M, roughly 1.6× Neptune Insurance Holdings Inc.). Neptune Insurance Holdings Inc. runs the higher net margin — 0.1% vs -18.5%, a 18.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Neptune Insurance Holdings Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (28.8% vs 6.6%).
Neptune Insurance Holdings Inc. is a specialty insurance holding company that offers a broad portfolio of property and casualty insurance products, with a core focus on residential and commercial flood insurance for customers across the United States. It serves both individual consumers and small to mid-sized business clients, using advanced data analytics to support accurate policy pricing and robust risk management.
Silicom Ltd. is a publicly traded company, headquartered in Israel, that specializes in the design, manufacture and marketing of connectivity solutions for a range of servers and server-based systems. Its shares are listed on the NASDAQ Global Market and on the Tel Aviv Stock Exchange. Silicom is a member of the RAD Group family of companies.
NP vs SILC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $37.8M | $61.9M |
| Net Profit | $50.0K | $-11.5M |
| Gross Margin | — | 30.6% |
| Operating Margin | — | -19.8% |
| Net Margin | 0.1% | -18.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 28.8% | 6.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | 0.0% | 16.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.05 | $-2.01 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $37.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $61.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $44.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $58.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $33.8M | — |
| Q1 26 | $50.0K | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $-11.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-13.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.1M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 30.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 28.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | -19.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 46.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -22.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 58.6% | — |
| Q1 26 | 0.1% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | -18.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 25.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -23.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 35.8% | — |
| Q1 26 | $0.05 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $-2.01 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.06 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-2.28 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.06 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $42.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $117.5M |
| Total Assets | — | $152.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $42.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $72.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $247.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $117.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-509.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $127.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-374.3M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $152.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $89.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $150.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $-2.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-3.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -5.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 1.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $-2.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $38.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $18.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $-3.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $17.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | -5.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 29.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 1.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.38× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
