vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Neptune Insurance Holdings Inc. (NP) and Snail, Inc. (SNAL). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Neptune Insurance Holdings Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($37.8M vs $25.1M, roughly 1.5× Snail, Inc.). Neptune Insurance Holdings Inc. runs the higher net margin — 0.1% vs -3.4%, a 3.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Neptune Insurance Holdings Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (28.8% vs -4.2%).
Neptune Insurance Holdings Inc. is a specialty insurance holding company that offers a broad portfolio of property and casualty insurance products, with a core focus on residential and commercial flood insurance for customers across the United States. It serves both individual consumers and small to mid-sized business clients, using advanced data analytics to support accurate policy pricing and robust risk management.
Suzhou Snail Digital Technology Co., Ltd., doing business as Snail, is a Chinese video game company and a Virtual Network Operator headquartered in Suzhou, China, which has branches Snail Games and Snail Mobile. Its division, Snail USA, markets Snail Games products in North America, South America, & Europe. Snail Games products include massively multiplayer online (MMOs), real-time strategy (RTS), and casual games. Its global registered user base has reached over 70 million accounts. The U.S....
NP vs SNAL — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $37.8M | $25.1M |
| Net Profit | $50.0K | $-862.2K |
| Gross Margin | — | 38.3% |
| Operating Margin | — | -6.0% |
| Net Margin | 0.1% | -3.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 28.8% | -4.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | 0.0% | -177.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.05 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $37.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $25.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $44.4M | $13.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $22.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $20.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $26.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $33.8M | $22.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $21.6M |
| Q1 26 | $50.0K | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $-862.2K | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.5M | $-7.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-16.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-1.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.1M | $235.1K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 38.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 31.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 29.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 43.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 38.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 37.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | -6.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 46.7% | -71.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -8.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -20.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 11.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 58.6% | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 12.4% |
| Q1 26 | 0.1% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | -3.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 25.9% | -56.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -74.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -9.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 4.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 35.8% | 1.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 10.4% |
| Q1 26 | $0.05 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.06 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-0.44 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-0.06 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.03 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.06 | $0.01 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.06 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $8.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $14.6M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $-16.4M |
| Total Assets | — | $59.3M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $8.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.2M | $12.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $7.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $9.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $7.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $10.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $15.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $14.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $247.6M | $10.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $11.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $9.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $5.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $5.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $5.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $-16.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-509.5M | $-15.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-8.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $9.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $9.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-374.3M | $8.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $7.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $59.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $89.6M | $51.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $58.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $64.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $62.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $66.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $75.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.99× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.59× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.70× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.73× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $-5.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $-5.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $38.9M | $6.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-3.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $764.5K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-3.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-5.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $206.6K |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.38× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -3.21× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -21.05× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.09× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
NP
Segment breakdown not available.
SNAL
| Pc | $14.7M | 59% |
| Platform Three | $5.2M | 21% |
| Platform Two | $3.3M | 13% |
| Sales Channel Directly To Consumer Mobile Sale | $1.6M | 6% |
