vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Natera, Inc. (NTRA) and SERVICE CORP INTERNATIONAL (SCI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
SERVICE CORP INTERNATIONAL is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.1B vs $665.5M, roughly 1.7× Natera, Inc.). SERVICE CORP INTERNATIONAL runs the higher net margin — 14.3% vs 7.1%, a 7.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Natera, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (39.8% vs 1.7%). SERVICE CORP INTERNATIONAL produced more free cash flow last quarter ($87.2M vs $37.8M). Over the past eight quarters, Natera, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (34.5% CAGR vs 3.1%).
Natera, Inc. is a clinical genetic testing company based in Austin, Texas that specializes in non-invasive, cell-free DNA (cfDNA) testing technology, with a focus on women’s health, cancer, and organ health. Natera’s proprietary technology combines novel molecular biology techniques with a suite of bioinformatics software that allows detection down to a single molecule in a tube of blood. Natera operates CAP-accredited laboratories certified under the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendment...
International Distribution Services Limited is a British company providing postal and courier services. IDS was created in 2013 by the UK government as a new holding company of Royal Mail, and a majority of its shares were then sold on the London Stock Exchange, with the government initially retaining a 30 per cent at the time. As of April 2025, IDS is owned and operated by Czech-based EP Group, owned by Daniel Křetínský.
NTRA vs SCI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $665.5M | $1.1B |
| Net Profit | $47.3M | $159.4M |
| Gross Margin | — | 28.0% |
| Operating Margin | -3.4% | 24.8% |
| Net Margin | 7.1% | 14.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 39.8% | 1.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | 187.9% | 5.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.36 | $1.13 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $665.5M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $592.2M | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $546.6M | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $501.8M | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $476.1M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $439.8M | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $413.4M | $1.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $367.7M | $1.0B |
| Q4 25 | $47.3M | $159.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-87.5M | $117.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-100.9M | $122.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-66.9M | $142.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-53.8M | $151.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-31.6M | $117.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-37.5M | $118.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-67.6M | $131.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | 28.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 25.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 25.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 27.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 28.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 24.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 24.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 26.2% |
| Q4 25 | -3.4% | 24.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -16.5% | 21.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -20.2% | 21.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -15.8% | 23.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | -13.6% | 24.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | -8.9% | 20.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -10.6% | 21.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | -20.2% | 22.2% |
| Q4 25 | 7.1% | 14.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -14.8% | 11.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -18.5% | 11.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -13.3% | 13.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | -11.3% | 13.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -7.2% | 11.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | -9.1% | 11.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | -18.4% | 12.6% |
| Q4 25 | $0.36 | $1.13 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.64 | $0.83 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.74 | $0.86 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.50 | $0.98 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.41 | $1.02 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.26 | $0.81 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.30 | $0.81 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.56 | $0.89 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $243.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $5.1B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.7B | $1.6B |
| Total Assets | $2.4B | $18.7B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 3.10× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $243.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.0M | $241.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $16.0M | $255.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $17.8M | $227.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $22.7M | $218.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $29.5M | $185.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $90.3M | $184.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $69.1M | $205.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | $5.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $5.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $5.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $4.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $4.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $4.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $4.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $4.6B |
| Q4 25 | $1.7B | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $1.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | $1.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $878.5M | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $836.5M | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $794.1M | $1.6B |
| Q4 25 | $2.4B | $18.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.8B | $18.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.8B | $18.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7B | $17.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.7B | $17.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6B | $17.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5B | $16.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.5B | $16.7B |
| Q4 25 | — | 3.10× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.17× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 3.19× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.87× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.83× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.92× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 3.05× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.90× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $73.9M | $212.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $37.8M | $87.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 5.7% | 7.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 5.4% | 11.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.56× | 1.34× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $109.1M | $554.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $73.9M | $212.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $59.4M | $252.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $37.6M | $166.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $44.5M | $311.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $52.9M | $264.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $51.8M | $263.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.0M | $196.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $27.0M | $220.1M |
| Q4 25 | $37.8M | $87.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $37.0M | $150.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.7M | $83.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $22.6M | $233.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $34.8M | $151.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $35.5M | $162.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-7.7M | $100.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.7M | $140.3M |
| Q4 25 | 5.7% | 7.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.2% | 14.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.1% | 7.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.5% | 21.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.3% | 13.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.1% | 16.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -1.9% | 9.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.8% | 13.4% |
| Q4 25 | 5.4% | 11.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.8% | 9.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.7% | 7.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.3% | 7.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.8% | 10.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.7% | 10.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.8% | 9.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.5% | 7.6% |
| Q4 25 | 1.56× | 1.34× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.15× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.35× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.18× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.75× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.24× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.67× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.68× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
NTRA
Segment breakdown not available.
SCI
| Cemetery | $510.9M | 46% |
| Funeral Matured Preneed Revenue | $196.5M | 18% |
| Cemetery Recognized Preneed Merchandise And Service Revenue | $107.4M | 10% |
| Cemetery Atneed Revenue | $104.9M | 9% |
| CA | $56.4M | 5% |
| Funeral Other Revenue | $54.6M | 5% |
| Cemetery Other Revenue | $40.2M | 4% |
| Nonfuneral Home Revenue | $28.1M | 3% |
| Non Funeral Home Preneed Sales Revenue | $22.0M | 2% |
