vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of NEWELL BRANDS INC. (NWL) and Teradyne (TER). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
NEWELL BRANDS INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.9B vs $1.3B, roughly 1.5× Teradyne). Teradyne runs the higher net margin — 31.1% vs -16.6%, a 47.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Teradyne posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (87.0% vs -2.7%). Over the past eight quarters, Teradyne's revenue compounded faster (32.6% CAGR vs 7.1%).
Newell Brands Inc. is an American conglomerate of consumer and commercial products. The company's brands and products include Rubbermaid storage/or waste disposal containers; home organization and reusable container products; Contigo and Bubba water bottles; Coleman outdoor products; writing instruments glue ; children's products ; cookware and small appliances and fragrance products.
Teradyne, Inc. is an American automatic test equipment (ATE) designer and manufacturer based in North Reading, Massachusetts. Its high-profile customers include Samsung, Qualcomm, Intel, Analog Devices, Texas Instruments and IBM.
NWL vs TER — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.9B | $1.3B |
| Net Profit | $-315.0M | $398.9M |
| Gross Margin | 33.1% | 60.9% |
| Operating Margin | -14.3% | 36.9% |
| Net Margin | -16.6% | 31.1% |
| Revenue YoY | -2.7% | 87.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | -483.3% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.75 | $2.53 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.9B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.8B | $769.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9B | $651.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.6B | $685.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.9B | $752.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.9B | $737.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0B | $729.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | $398.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-315.0M | $257.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $21.0M | $119.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $46.0M | $78.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-37.0M | $98.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-54.0M | $146.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-198.0M | $145.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $45.0M | $186.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | 60.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | 33.1% | 57.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 34.1% | 58.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 35.4% | 57.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 32.1% | 60.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 34.2% | 59.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 34.9% | 59.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 34.4% | 58.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | 36.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | -14.3% | 27.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.6% | 18.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.8% | 13.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.3% | 17.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.5% | 20.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | -6.2% | 20.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.0% | 28.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | 31.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | -16.6% | 23.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.2% | 15.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.4% | 12.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -2.4% | 14.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | -2.8% | 19.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | -10.2% | 19.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.2% | 25.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | $2.53 | ||
| Q4 25 | $-0.75 | $1.62 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.05 | $0.75 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.11 | $0.49 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.09 | $0.61 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.13 | $0.89 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.48 | $0.89 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.11 | $1.14 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $203.0M | $241.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $0 |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.4B | — |
| Total Assets | $10.7B | $4.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $241.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | $203.0M | $293.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $229.0M | $272.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $219.0M | $339.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $233.0M | $475.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $198.0M | $553.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $494.0M | $510.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $382.0M | $421.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | $0 | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.4B | $2.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.7B | $2.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.7B | $2.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.7B | $2.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.8B | $2.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.9B | $2.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.1B | $2.7B |
| Q1 26 | — | $4.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | $10.7B | $4.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.3B | $4.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.5B | $3.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.3B | $3.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.0B | $3.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.8B | $3.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $12.0B | $3.6B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $161.0M | $265.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $91.0M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 4.8% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.7% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 0.66× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $17.0M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $265.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $161.0M | $281.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $374.0M | $49.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-58.0M | $182.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-213.0M | $161.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $150.0M | $282.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $282.0M | $166.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $32.0M | $216.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $91.0M | $218.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $315.0M | $2.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-117.0M | $131.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-272.0M | $97.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $54.0M | $225.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $231.0M | $114.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-21.0M | $171.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.8% | 20.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 17.4% | 0.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -6.0% | 20.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -17.4% | 14.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.8% | 29.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.9% | 15.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -1.0% | 23.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.7% | 5.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.3% | 6.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.0% | 7.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.8% | 9.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.9% | 7.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.6% | 7.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.6% | 6.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.66× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 1.09× | ||
| Q3 25 | 17.81× | 0.41× | ||
| Q2 25 | -1.26× | 2.32× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.63× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.93× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.14× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.71× | 1.16× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
NWL
| Kitchen | $538.0M | 28% |
| Writing | $370.0M | 20% |
| Commercial | $320.0M | 17% |
| Financial Institution Two | $286.0M | 15% |
| Baby | $259.0M | 14% |
| Outdoor And Recreation | $142.0M | 7% |
TER
Segment breakdown not available.
