vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Orchestra BioMed Holdings, Inc. (OBIO) and TELEFLEX INC (TFX). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
TELEFLEX INC runs the higher net margin — 177.8% vs 20.2%, a 157.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Orchestra BioMed Holdings, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (12120.2% vs -150.5%). Orchestra BioMed Holdings, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-2.3M vs $-92.9M). Over the past eight quarters, TELEFLEX INC's revenue compounded faster (NaN% CAGR vs NaN%).
Orchestra BioMed Holdings, Inc. is a clinical-stage medical technology company focused on developing novel, evidence-based therapeutic solutions for cardiovascular and other high-burden chronic diseases. It collaborates with leading healthcare stakeholders, operates primarily across North American and European markets, with core segments covering interventional cardiology and chronic disease care optimization.
Teleflex Incorporated, headquartered in Wayne, Pennsylvania, is an American provider of specialty medical devices for a range of procedures in critical care and surgery. Teleflex has annual revenues of $2.4 billion, operations in 40 countries, and more than 15,000 employees. By 2011, the company had substantially realigned to focus on its current business as a medical-device manufacturer, having undergone several years of active acquisitions and divestitures. Teleflex has been associated with...
OBIO vs TFX — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 2025 vs Q4 2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $30.9M | $-401.9M |
| Net Profit | $6.2M | $-714.3M |
| Gross Margin | 99.8% | — |
| Operating Margin | 21.8% | — |
| Net Margin | 20.2% | 177.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 12120.2% | -150.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | 138.7% | -422.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.28 | $-15.85 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $30.9M | $-401.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $861.0K | $913.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $836.0K | $780.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $868.0K | $700.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $253.0K | $795.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $987.0K | $764.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $778.0K | $749.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $620.0K | $737.8M |
| Q4 25 | $6.2M | $-714.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-20.8M | $-408.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-19.4M | $122.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-18.8M | $95.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-16.2M | $-136.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-15.4M | $111.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-16.0M | $80.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-13.5M | $15.3M |
| Q4 25 | 99.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 94.3% | 49.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 94.5% | 55.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 94.9% | 55.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 77.1% | 55.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 93.1% | 56.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 94.3% | 55.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 94.5% | 56.4% |
| Q4 25 | 21.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -2359.2% | -44.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -2311.8% | 19.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -2179.8% | 17.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | -6591.7% | -13.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -1655.7% | 19.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -2167.0% | 15.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | -2326.3% | -0.6% |
| Q4 25 | 20.2% | 177.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -2419.0% | -44.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -2316.1% | 15.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -2160.7% | 13.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -6385.4% | -17.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | -1562.9% | 14.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -2054.0% | 10.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -2171.5% | 2.1% |
| Q4 25 | $0.28 | $-15.85 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.40 | $-9.24 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.50 | $2.77 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.49 | $2.07 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.42 | $-2.89 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.41 | $2.36 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.45 | $1.69 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.38 | $0.32 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $106.5M | $378.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $15.0M | $2.6B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $53.6M | $3.1B |
| Total Assets | $114.9M | $6.9B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.28× | 0.85× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $106.5M | $378.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $95.8M | $354.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $33.9M | $253.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $49.9M | $284.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $66.8M | $290.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $66.9M | $243.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $65.2M | $238.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $75.0M | $237.4M |
| Q4 25 | $15.0M | $2.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $15.0M | $2.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $15.0M | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $15.0M | $1.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $15.0M | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $53.6M | $3.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $43.7M | $3.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $295.0K | $4.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $16.9M | $4.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $33.0M | $4.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $46.2M | $4.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $44.1M | $4.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | $57.2M | $4.5B |
| Q4 25 | $114.9M | $6.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $104.8M | $7.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $42.8M | $7.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $59.1M | $7.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $76.2M | $7.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $75.3M | $7.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $72.4M | $7.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $82.6M | $7.5B |
| Q4 25 | 0.28× | 0.85× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.34× | 0.70× | ||
| Q2 25 | 50.85× | 0.45× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.89× | 0.47× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.46× | 0.39× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-2.3M | $-92.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-2.3M | $-92.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -7.4% | 23.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.1% | -0.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -0.36× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-49.5M | $1.4M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-2.3M | $-92.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-14.6M | $107.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-15.5M | $7.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-16.6M | $73.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-13.5M | $202.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-13.7M | $231.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-10.2M | $91.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-13.1M | $112.8M |
| Q4 25 | $-2.3M | $-92.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-14.9M | $77.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-15.6M | $-26.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-16.7M | $43.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-13.6M | $170.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-13.8M | $209.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-10.3M | $56.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-13.1M | $74.4M |
| Q4 25 | -7.4% | 23.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -1725.9% | 8.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -1861.4% | -3.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -1927.2% | 6.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -5392.9% | 21.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | -1394.9% | 27.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -1325.6% | 7.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | -2116.5% | 10.1% |
| Q4 25 | 0.1% | -0.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 36.0% | 3.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.1% | 4.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 12.9% | 4.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 41.9% | 4.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.9% | 2.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 13.8% | 4.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.3% | 5.2% |
| Q4 25 | -0.36× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.06× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.77× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.08× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.15× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 7.38× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
