vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Orange County Bancorp, Inc. (OBT) and ORASURE TECHNOLOGIES INC (OSUR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Orange County Bancorp, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($33.0M vs $26.8M, roughly 1.2× ORASURE TECHNOLOGIES INC). Orange County Bancorp, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 37.6% vs -72.1%, a 109.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Orange County Bancorp, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (20.6% vs -28.5%). Orange County Bancorp, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($41.3M vs $-9.9M). Over the past eight quarters, Orange County Bancorp, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (14.3% CAGR vs -29.7%).
Orange County Bancorp, Inc. is a Delaware-registered bank holding company operating mainly in New York, U.S. It offers a full range of retail and commercial banking services, including deposit accounts, loans and wealth management solutions, serving individual consumers, small and mid-sized corporate clients in its regional footprint.
OraSure Technologies, Inc. is a Bethlehem, Pennsylvania–based company in the medical device industry. Their products include diagnostic testing kits. The company had recently developed OraQuick testing kit, the first over-the-counter home HIV test.
OBT vs OSUR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $33.0M | $26.8M |
| Net Profit | $12.4M | $-19.3M |
| Gross Margin | — | 41.0% |
| Operating Margin | 41.4% | -75.1% |
| Net Margin | 37.6% | -72.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 20.6% | -28.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | 73.5% | -78.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.94 | $-0.28 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $33.0M | $26.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $33.7M | $27.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $32.5M | $31.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $28.0M | $29.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $27.4M | $37.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $27.1M | $39.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $27.9M | $54.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $25.3M | $54.1M |
| Q4 25 | $12.4M | $-19.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.0M | $-13.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.5M | $-19.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.7M | $-16.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.2M | $-10.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.2M | $-4.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.2M | $-615.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $9.3M | $-3.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | 41.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 43.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 42.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 41.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 36.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 42.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 45.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 44.5% |
| Q4 25 | 41.4% | -75.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 38.6% | -59.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 41.9% | -57.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 40.3% | -59.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 32.8% | -33.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.8% | -15.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 36.6% | -5.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 45.9% | -13.1% |
| Q4 25 | 37.6% | -72.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 29.7% | -50.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 32.2% | -63.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 31.1% | -53.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 26.2% | -28.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.8% | -11.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 29.4% | -1.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 36.7% | -6.6% |
| Q4 25 | $0.94 | $-0.28 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.75 | $-0.19 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.87 | $-0.26 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.77 | $-0.21 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.64 | $-0.14 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.28 | $-0.06 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.73 | $-0.01 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.82 | $-0.05 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $199.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $284.4M | $340.8M |
| Total Assets | $2.7B | $403.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $199.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $216.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $234.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $247.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $267.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $278.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $267.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $263.8M |
| Q4 25 | $284.4M | $340.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $270.1M | $362.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $252.6M | $380.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $201.3M | $396.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $185.5M | $410.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $193.1M | $425.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $177.5M | $425.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $168.7M | $426.3M |
| Q4 25 | $2.7B | $403.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.6B | $423.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.6B | $445.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.6B | $457.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.5B | $479.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.5B | $464.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.5B | $466.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.5B | $467.6M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $43.8M | $-9.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $41.3M | $-9.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 125.1% | -37.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 7.6% | 3.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 3.53× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $69.6M | $-53.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $43.8M | $-9.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $30.2M | $-10.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-5.0M | $-10.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.8M | $-19.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $34.6M | $109.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $10.2M | $12.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.3M | $7.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.3M | $6.7M |
| Q4 25 | $41.3M | $-9.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $29.6M | $-11.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-5.7M | $-12.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.3M | $-20.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $32.9M | $-347.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $10.0M | $12.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.2M | $6.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.0M | $5.2M |
| Q4 25 | 125.1% | -37.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 87.8% | -40.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -17.5% | -38.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 15.5% | -67.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 120.0% | -0.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 36.7% | 31.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 32.8% | 11.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 7.9% | 9.5% |
| Q4 25 | 7.6% | 3.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.8% | 3.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.3% | 6.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.8% | 1.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.3% | 1.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.1% | 0.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.4% | 3.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.0% | 2.9% |
| Q4 25 | 3.53× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.01× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.47× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.56× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.83× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.19× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.13× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.24× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
OBT
Segment breakdown not available.
OSUR
| Product And Services | $24.9M | 93% |
| Other | $1.9M | 7% |
