vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of OLAPLEX HOLDINGS, INC. (OLPX) and SHENANDOAH TELECOMMUNICATIONS CO (SHEN). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
OLAPLEX HOLDINGS, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($105.1M vs $91.6M, roughly 1.1× SHENANDOAH TELECOMMUNICATIONS CO). SHENANDOAH TELECOMMUNICATIONS CO runs the higher net margin — -5.9% vs -12.5%, a 6.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, SHENANDOAH TELECOMMUNICATIONS CO posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (7.2% vs 4.3%). OLAPLEX HOLDINGS, INC. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($32.6M vs $-78.6M). Over the past eight quarters, SHENANDOAH TELECOMMUNICATIONS CO's revenue compounded faster (15.0% CAGR vs 3.1%).
Olaplex Holdings, Inc. is a specialty beauty company developing and selling patented bond-repair hair care products. It runs three core segments: professional salon distribution, direct-to-consumer sales, and third-party retail, serving customers across North America, Europe, and Asia-Pacific with products that repair and protect damaged hair.
Shenandoah Telecommunications Co is a U.S. regional telecom provider offering broadband internet, wireless voice/data services, digital cable TV, and fiber-optic solutions. It serves residential, small business and enterprise clients across Mid-Atlantic states, focusing on underserved rural and suburban markets in Virginia, West Virginia, Maryland and Pennsylvania.
OLPX vs SHEN — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $105.1M | $91.6M |
| Net Profit | $-13.1M | $-5.4M |
| Gross Margin | 68.0% | — |
| Operating Margin | -4.3% | -1.0% |
| Net Margin | -12.5% | -5.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 4.3% | 7.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | -48.9% | -95.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.02 | $-0.13 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $105.1M | $91.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $114.6M | $89.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $106.3M | $88.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $97.0M | $87.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $100.7M | $85.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $119.1M | $87.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $103.9M | $85.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $98.9M | $69.2M |
| Q4 25 | $-13.1M | $-5.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.1M | $-9.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.7M | $-9.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $465.0K | $-9.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-8.8M | $-2.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $14.8M | $-5.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.8M | $-12.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.7M | $214.7M |
| Q4 25 | 68.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 69.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 71.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 69.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 66.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 68.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 69.7% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 72.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | -4.3% | -1.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.7% | -8.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -1.1% | -10.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.7% | -6.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.0% | -6.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 23.5% | -4.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 15.7% | -18.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 19.8% | -4.0% |
| Q4 25 | -12.5% | -5.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.7% | -10.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -7.3% | -10.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.5% | -10.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | -8.7% | -3.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 12.4% | -6.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.6% | -15.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 7.8% | 310.0% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.02 | $-0.13 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.02 | $-0.20 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.01 | $-0.19 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.00 | $-0.19 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.01 | $-0.34 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.02 | $-0.13 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.01 | $-0.24 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.01 | $4.25 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $318.7M | $27.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $352.3M | $642.4M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $879.4M | $880.8M |
| Total Assets | $1.5B | $1.9B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.40× | 0.73× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $318.7M | $27.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $286.4M | $22.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $289.3M | $29.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $580.9M | $87.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $586.0M | $46.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $538.8M | $43.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $507.9M | $43.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $507.5M | $389.7M |
| Q4 25 | $352.3M | $642.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $352.1M | $535.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $351.9M | $513.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $649.1M | $515.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $650.5M | $418.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $651.8M | $345.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $653.1M | $297.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $654.4M | $298.7M |
| Q4 25 | $879.4M | $880.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $888.7M | $892.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $874.2M | $902.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $878.3M | $910.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $874.4M | $918.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $879.7M | $925.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $863.3M | $933.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $855.7M | $871.6M |
| Q4 25 | $1.5B | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | $1.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5B | $1.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.8B | $1.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.8B | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8B | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8B | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.8B | $1.4B |
| Q4 25 | 0.40× | 0.73× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.40× | 0.60× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.40× | 0.57× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.74× | 0.57× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.74× | 0.46× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.74× | 0.37× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.76× | 0.32× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.76× | 0.34× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $32.7M | $28.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $32.6M | $-78.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 31.0% | -85.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.1% | 117.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $58.3M | $-257.9M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $32.7M | $28.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.0M | $30.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $20.9M | $20.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-2.9M | $20.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $49.7M | $20.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $33.5M | $24.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $16.2M | $2.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $43.7M | $15.2M |
| Q4 25 | $32.6M | $-78.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.9M | $-51.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $20.8M | $-65.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.0M | $-62.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $49.2M | $-72.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $33.3M | $-51.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $16.1M | $-78.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $43.3M | $-54.9M |
| Q4 25 | 31.0% | -85.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.9% | -57.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 19.6% | -73.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -3.1% | -71.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 48.9% | -84.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 28.0% | -58.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 15.5% | -91.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 43.7% | -79.3% |
| Q4 25 | 0.1% | 117.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.1% | 91.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.1% | 97.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.0% | 94.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.4% | 108.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.1% | 86.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.1% | 94.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.5% | 101.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.72× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -6.27× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.26× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.81× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.64× | 0.07× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
OLPX
| Sales Channel Directly To Consumer | $43.6M | 42% |
| Sales Channel Through Intermediary Professional | $36.8M | 35% |
| Sales Channel Through Intermediary Specialty Retail | $24.7M | 23% |
SHEN
| Residential And SMB Incumbent Broadband | $41.5M | 45% |
| Residential And SMB Glo Fiber Expansion Markets | $23.0M | 25% |
| Commercial Fiber | $20.3M | 22% |
| RLEC Other | $6.8M | 7% |
