vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ON Semiconductor (ON) and Primerica, Inc. (PRI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
ON Semiconductor is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.6B vs $853.7M, roughly 1.8× Primerica, Inc.). Primerica, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 23.1% vs 16.4%, a 6.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Primerica, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (11.0% vs -10.0%). Over the past eight quarters, Primerica, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (7.2% CAGR vs -12.3%).
Fairchild Semiconductor International, Inc. was an American semiconductor company based in San Jose, California. It was founded in 1957 as a division of Fairchild Camera and Instrument by the "traitorous eight" who defected from Shockley Semiconductor Laboratory. It became a pioneer in the manufacturing of transistors and of integrated circuits. Schlumberger bought the firm in 1979 and sold it to National Semiconductor in 1987; Fairchild was spun off as an independent company again in 1997. I...
Primerica, Inc. is a multi-level marketing company that provides insurance, investment and financial services to middle-income families in the United States and Canada.
ON vs PRI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.6B | $853.7M |
| Net Profit | $255.0M | $197.0M |
| Gross Margin | 37.9% | — |
| Operating Margin | 17.0% | 28.9% |
| Net Margin | 16.4% | 23.1% |
| Revenue YoY | -10.0% | 11.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | -32.9% | 17.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.63 | $6.11 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.6B | $853.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | $839.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.4B | $793.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $804.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.7B | $768.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8B | $774.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7B | $803.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.9B | $742.8M |
| Q4 25 | $255.0M | $197.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $170.3M | $206.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-486.1M | $178.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $169.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $379.9M | $167.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $401.7M | $164.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $338.2M | $1.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $453.0M | $137.9M |
| Q4 25 | 37.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 37.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 20.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 45.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 45.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 45.2% | 98.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 45.8% | 98.2% |
| Q4 25 | 17.0% | 28.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.2% | 32.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -39.7% | 29.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 27.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 23.7% | 64.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 25.3% | 32.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 22.4% | 1.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 28.2% | 24.1% |
| Q4 25 | 16.4% | 23.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.6% | 24.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -33.6% | 22.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 21.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.1% | 21.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.8% | 21.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.5% | 0.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 24.3% | 18.6% |
| Q4 25 | $0.63 | $6.11 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.41 | $6.35 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.15 | $5.40 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $5.05 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.88 | $4.92 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.93 | $4.83 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.78 | $0.03 | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.04 | $3.93 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $2.9B | $756.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $3.4B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $7.9B | $2.4B |
| Total Assets | $13.0B | $15.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.43× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $2.9B | $756.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.8B | $644.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.0B | $621.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $625.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.0B | $687.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.8B | $550.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.7B | $627.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.6B | $593.4M |
| Q4 25 | $3.4B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.4B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.4B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.4B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.4B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.4B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.4B | — |
| Q4 25 | $7.9B | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.9B | $2.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.0B | $2.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.8B | $2.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.6B | $1.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.3B | $2.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $8.1B | $2.2B |
| Q4 25 | $13.0B | $15.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $13.1B | $14.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $13.3B | $14.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $14.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $14.1B | $14.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $13.9B | $14.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $13.7B | $14.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | $13.5B | $14.9B |
| Q4 25 | 0.43× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.43× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.42× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.38× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.39× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.41× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.42× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $418.7M | $338.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $372.4M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 24.0% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.0% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.64× | 1.72× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $1.4B | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $418.7M | $338.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $184.3M | $202.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $602.3M | $162.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $197.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $579.7M | $270.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $465.8M | $207.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $362.2M | $173.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $498.7M | $210.9M |
| Q4 25 | $372.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $106.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $454.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $434.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $293.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $207.7M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $276.3M | — |
| Q4 25 | 24.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 31.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 25.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.0% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 14.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | 3.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.9% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 11.9% | — |
| Q4 25 | 1.64× | 1.72× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.08× | 0.98× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.91× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.17× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.53× | 1.62× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.16× | 1.26× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.07× | 147.98× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.10× | 1.53× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ON
| Industrial Segment | $426.3M | 27% |
| Other End Markets Segment | $337.3M | 22% |
| Intelligent Sensing Segments | $284.0M | 18% |
| Direct Customers | $282.4M | 18% |
| Intelligent Sensing Group | $230.0M | 15% |
PRI
| Revenues From Sources Other Than Contracts With Customers | $445.9M | 52% |
| Investment And Savings Products Segment Revenues | $340.3M | 40% |
| Other | $56.5M | 7% |
| Segment Revenues From Contracts With Customers | $11.0M | 1% |
