vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ON Semiconductor (ON) and SERVICE CORP INTERNATIONAL (SCI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
ON Semiconductor is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.6B vs $1.1B, roughly 1.4× SERVICE CORP INTERNATIONAL). ON Semiconductor runs the higher net margin — 16.4% vs 14.3%, a 2.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, SERVICE CORP INTERNATIONAL posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (1.7% vs -10.0%). ON Semiconductor produced more free cash flow last quarter ($372.4M vs $87.2M). Over the past eight quarters, SERVICE CORP INTERNATIONAL's revenue compounded faster (3.1% CAGR vs -12.3%).
Fairchild Semiconductor International, Inc. was an American semiconductor company based in San Jose, California. It was founded in 1957 as a division of Fairchild Camera and Instrument by the "traitorous eight" who defected from Shockley Semiconductor Laboratory. It became a pioneer in the manufacturing of transistors and of integrated circuits. Schlumberger bought the firm in 1979 and sold it to National Semiconductor in 1987; Fairchild was spun off as an independent company again in 1997. I...
International Distribution Services Limited is a British company providing postal and courier services. IDS was created in 2013 by the UK government as a new holding company of Royal Mail, and a majority of its shares were then sold on the London Stock Exchange, with the government initially retaining a 30 per cent at the time. As of April 2025, IDS is owned and operated by Czech-based EP Group, owned by Daniel Křetínský.
ON vs SCI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.6B | $1.1B |
| Net Profit | $255.0M | $159.4M |
| Gross Margin | 37.9% | 28.0% |
| Operating Margin | 17.0% | 24.8% |
| Net Margin | 16.4% | 14.3% |
| Revenue YoY | -10.0% | 1.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | -32.9% | 5.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.63 | $1.13 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.6B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.4B | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.7B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8B | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7B | $1.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.9B | $1.0B |
| Q4 25 | $255.0M | $159.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $170.3M | $117.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-486.1M | $122.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $142.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $379.9M | $151.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $401.7M | $117.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $338.2M | $118.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $453.0M | $131.3M |
| Q4 25 | 37.9% | 28.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 37.6% | 25.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 20.3% | 25.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 27.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 45.2% | 28.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 45.4% | 24.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 45.2% | 24.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 45.8% | 26.2% |
| Q4 25 | 17.0% | 24.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.2% | 21.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -39.7% | 21.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 23.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 23.7% | 24.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 25.3% | 20.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 22.4% | 21.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 28.2% | 22.2% |
| Q4 25 | 16.4% | 14.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.6% | 11.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -33.6% | 11.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 13.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.1% | 13.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.8% | 11.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.5% | 11.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 24.3% | 12.6% |
| Q4 25 | $0.63 | $1.13 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.41 | $0.83 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.15 | $0.86 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.98 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.88 | $1.02 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.93 | $0.81 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.78 | $0.81 | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.04 | $0.89 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $2.9B | $243.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $3.4B | $5.1B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $7.9B | $1.6B |
| Total Assets | $13.0B | $18.7B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.43× | 3.10× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $2.9B | $243.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.8B | $241.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.0B | $255.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $227.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.0B | $218.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.8B | $185.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.7B | $184.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.6B | $205.6M |
| Q4 25 | $3.4B | $5.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.4B | $5.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.4B | $5.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $4.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.4B | $4.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.4B | $4.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.4B | $4.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.4B | $4.6B |
| Q4 25 | $7.9B | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.9B | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.0B | $1.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.8B | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.6B | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.3B | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $8.1B | $1.6B |
| Q4 25 | $13.0B | $18.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $13.1B | $18.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $13.3B | $18.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $17.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $14.1B | $17.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $13.9B | $17.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $13.7B | $16.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | $13.5B | $16.7B |
| Q4 25 | 0.43× | 3.10× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.43× | 3.17× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.42× | 3.19× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.87× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.38× | 2.83× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.39× | 2.92× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.41× | 3.05× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.42× | 2.90× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $418.7M | $212.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $372.4M | $87.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 24.0% | 7.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.0% | 11.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.64× | 1.34× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $1.4B | $554.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $418.7M | $212.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $184.3M | $252.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $602.3M | $166.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $311.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $579.7M | $264.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $465.8M | $263.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $362.2M | $196.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $498.7M | $220.1M |
| Q4 25 | $372.4M | $87.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $106.1M | $150.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $454.7M | $83.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $233.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $434.8M | $151.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $293.6M | $162.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $207.7M | $100.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $276.3M | $140.3M |
| Q4 25 | 24.0% | 7.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.2% | 14.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 31.5% | 7.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 21.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 25.2% | 13.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.7% | 16.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.0% | 9.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 14.8% | 13.4% |
| Q4 25 | 3.0% | 11.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.3% | 9.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.2% | 7.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 7.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.4% | 10.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.8% | 10.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.9% | 9.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 11.9% | 7.6% |
| Q4 25 | 1.64× | 1.34× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.08× | 2.15× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.35× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.18× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.53× | 1.75× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.16× | 2.24× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.07× | 1.67× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.10× | 1.68× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ON
| Industrial Segment | $426.3M | 27% |
| Other End Markets Segment | $337.3M | 22% |
| Intelligent Sensing Segments | $284.0M | 18% |
| Direct Customers | $282.4M | 18% |
| Intelligent Sensing Group | $230.0M | 15% |
SCI
| Cemetery | $510.9M | 46% |
| Funeral Matured Preneed Revenue | $196.5M | 18% |
| Cemetery Recognized Preneed Merchandise And Service Revenue | $107.4M | 10% |
| Cemetery Atneed Revenue | $104.9M | 9% |
| CA | $56.4M | 5% |
| Funeral Other Revenue | $54.6M | 5% |
| Cemetery Other Revenue | $40.2M | 4% |
| Nonfuneral Home Revenue | $28.1M | 3% |
| Non Funeral Home Preneed Sales Revenue | $22.0M | 2% |
