vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ON Semiconductor (ON) and ZIONS BANCORPORATION, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION (ZION). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
ON Semiconductor is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.6B vs $891.0M, roughly 1.7× ZIONS BANCORPORATION, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION). ZIONS BANCORPORATION, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION runs the higher net margin — 29.5% vs 16.4%, a 13.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, ZIONS BANCORPORATION, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (8.7% vs -10.0%). ZIONS BANCORPORATION, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION produced more free cash flow last quarter ($952.0M vs $372.4M). Over the past eight quarters, ZIONS BANCORPORATION, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION's revenue compounded faster (9.6% CAGR vs -12.3%).
Fairchild Semiconductor International, Inc. was an American semiconductor company based in San Jose, California. It was founded in 1957 as a division of Fairchild Camera and Instrument by the "traitorous eight" who defected from Shockley Semiconductor Laboratory. It became a pioneer in the manufacturing of transistors and of integrated circuits. Schlumberger bought the firm in 1979 and sold it to National Semiconductor in 1987; Fairchild was spun off as an independent company again in 1997. I...
Zions Bancorporation is an American national bank headquartered in Salt Lake City, Utah. It operates as a national bank rather than as a bank holding company and does business under the following seven brands: Zions Bank, Amegy Bank of Texas, California Bank and Trust, National Bank of Arizona, Nevada State Bank, Vectra Bank Colorado, and the Commerce Bank of Washington.
ON vs ZION — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.6B | $891.0M |
| Net Profit | $255.0M | $263.0M |
| Gross Margin | 37.9% | — |
| Operating Margin | 17.0% | — |
| Net Margin | 16.4% | 29.5% |
| Revenue YoY | -10.0% | 8.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | -32.9% | 21.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.63 | $1.77 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.6B | $891.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | $861.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.4B | $838.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $795.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.7B | $820.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8B | $792.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7B | $777.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.9B | $742.0M |
| Q4 25 | $255.0M | $263.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $170.3M | $222.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-486.1M | $244.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $170.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $379.9M | $216.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $401.7M | $214.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $338.2M | $201.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $453.0M | $153.0M |
| Q4 25 | 37.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 37.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 20.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 45.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 45.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 45.2% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 45.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | 17.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -39.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 23.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 25.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 22.4% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 28.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | 16.4% | 29.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.6% | 25.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -33.6% | 29.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 21.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.1% | 26.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.8% | 27.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.5% | 25.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 24.3% | 20.6% |
| Q4 25 | $0.63 | $1.77 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.41 | $1.48 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.15 | $1.63 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.13 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.88 | $1.34 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.93 | $1.37 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.78 | $1.28 | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.04 | $0.96 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $2.9B | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $3.4B | $1.5B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $7.9B | $7.2B |
| Total Assets | $13.0B | $89.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.43× | 0.21× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $2.9B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.8B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.0B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.0B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.8B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.7B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.6B | — |
| Q4 25 | $3.4B | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.4B | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.4B | $970.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $964.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.4B | $950.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.4B | $548.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.4B | $546.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.4B | $544.0M |
| Q4 25 | $7.9B | $7.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.9B | $6.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.0B | $6.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $6.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.8B | $6.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.6B | $6.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.3B | $6.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $8.1B | $5.8B |
| Q4 25 | $13.0B | $89.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $13.1B | $88.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $13.3B | $88.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $88.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $14.1B | $88.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $13.9B | $87.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $13.7B | $87.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | $13.5B | $87.1B |
| Q4 25 | 0.43× | 0.21× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.43× | 0.21× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.42× | 0.15× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.15× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.38× | 0.16× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.39× | 0.09× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.41× | 0.09× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.42× | 0.09× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $418.7M | $1.1B |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $372.4M | $952.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 24.0% | 106.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.0% | 13.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.64× | 4.08× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $1.4B | $1.4B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $418.7M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $184.3M | $438.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $602.3M | $-62.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $179.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $579.7M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $465.8M | $119.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $362.2M | $251.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $498.7M | $261.0M |
| Q4 25 | $372.4M | $952.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $106.1M | $413.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $454.7M | $-93.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $152.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $434.8M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $293.6M | $97.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $207.7M | $234.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $276.3M | $231.0M |
| Q4 25 | 24.0% | 106.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.2% | 48.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 31.5% | -11.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 19.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 25.2% | 128.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.7% | 12.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.0% | 30.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 14.8% | 31.1% |
| Q4 25 | 3.0% | 13.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.3% | 2.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.2% | 3.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 3.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.4% | 11.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.8% | 2.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.9% | 2.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 11.9% | 4.0% |
| Q4 25 | 1.64× | 4.08× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.08× | 1.97× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -0.25× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.05× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.53× | 5.31× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.16× | 0.56× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.07× | 1.25× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.10× | 1.71× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ON
| Industrial Segment | $426.3M | 27% |
| Other End Markets Segment | $337.3M | 22% |
| Intelligent Sensing Segments | $284.0M | 18% |
| Direct Customers | $282.4M | 18% |
| Intelligent Sensing Group | $230.0M | 15% |
ZION
Segment breakdown not available.
