vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ONTO INNOVATION INC. (ONTO) and PARK NATIONAL CORP (PRK). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
ONTO INNOVATION INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($218.2M vs $168.3M, roughly 1.3× PARK NATIONAL CORP). PARK NATIONAL CORP runs the higher net margin — 25.3% vs 12.9%, a 12.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, PARK NATIONAL CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (2.2% vs -13.5%). PARK NATIONAL CORP produced more free cash flow last quarter ($191.9M vs $82.0M). Over the past eight quarters, PARK NATIONAL CORP's revenue compounded faster (4.9% CAGR vs 2.6%).
Onto Innovation Inc. is an American semiconductor company formed in 2019 from the merger of Rudolph Technologies, Inc. and Nanometrics Incorporated. It is a provider of process and process control equipment and software for microelectronic manufacturing industries.
National Retail Systems, Inc. (NRS) includes Keystone Freight Corp. & National Retail Transportation, Inc. (NRT). NRS is an asset based 3PL founded in 1952. It is headquartered in Lyndhurst, New Jersey, United States.
ONTO vs PRK — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $218.2M | $168.3M |
| Net Profit | $28.2M | $42.6M |
| Gross Margin | 50.7% | — |
| Operating Margin | 10.9% | — |
| Net Margin | 12.9% | 25.3% |
| Revenue YoY | -13.5% | 2.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | -46.8% | 10.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.57 | $2.62 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $168.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $218.2M | $169.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $253.6M | $168.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $266.6M | $157.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $263.9M | $164.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $252.2M | $170.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $242.3M | $157.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $228.8M | $152.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | $42.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $28.2M | $47.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $33.9M | $48.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $64.1M | $42.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $48.8M | $38.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $53.1M | $38.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $52.9M | $39.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $46.9M | $35.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 50.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 48.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 53.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 50.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 54.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 52.9% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 51.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.9% | 34.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.7% | 35.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 23.7% | 32.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 21.0% | 27.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.2% | 30.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 18.7% | 27.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | 25.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 12.9% | 27.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.4% | 28.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 24.0% | 26.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 18.5% | 23.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 21.0% | 22.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 21.9% | 25.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 20.5% | 23.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | $2.62 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.57 | $2.92 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.69 | $2.97 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.30 | $2.60 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.98 | $2.38 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.07 | $2.35 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.07 | $2.42 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.94 | $2.17 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $603.1M | $233.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.0B | $1.4B |
| Total Assets | $2.2B | $9.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $233.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $603.1M | $218.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $217.5M | $193.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $203.7M | $237.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $212.9M | $160.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $188.7M | $201.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $172.6M | $261.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $190.9M | $306.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.0B | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.0B | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.9B | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.9B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.9B | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8B | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.8B | $1.2B |
| Q4 25 | — | $9.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.2B | $9.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.1B | $9.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.1B | $9.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.1B | $9.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1B | $9.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0B | $9.9B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.0B | $9.9B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $83.4M | $198.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $82.0M | $191.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 37.6% | 114.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.6% | 3.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 2.95× | 4.65× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $261.3M | $328.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $198.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $83.4M | $52.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $57.9M | $49.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $92.0M | $37.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $56.0M | $178.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $67.2M | $43.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $65.3M | $50.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $57.1M | $35.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | $191.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $82.0M | $51.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $44.2M | $48.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $83.7M | $36.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $51.4M | $169.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $59.2M | $41.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $53.0M | $49.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $50.2M | $31.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | 114.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 37.6% | 30.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 17.4% | 28.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 31.4% | 23.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.5% | 103.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 23.5% | 24.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 21.9% | 31.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 21.9% | 20.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | 3.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.6% | 0.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.4% | 0.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.1% | 0.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.8% | 5.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.2% | 1.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.1% | 1.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.0% | 2.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | 4.65× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.95× | 1.11× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.71× | 1.03× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.44× | 0.90× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.15× | 4.63× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.27× | 1.14× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.23× | 1.29× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.22× | 0.99× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ONTO
| Systems And Software Revenue | $173.8M | 80% |
| Parts Revenue | $23.9M | 11% |
| Service Revenue | $20.5M | 9% |
PRK
Segment breakdown not available.