vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ONESPAWORLD HOLDINGS Ltd (OSW) and Walker & Dunlop, Inc. (WD). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Walker & Dunlop, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($340.0M vs $242.1M, roughly 1.4× ONESPAWORLD HOLDINGS Ltd). ONESPAWORLD HOLDINGS Ltd runs the higher net margin — 5.0% vs -12.9%, a 17.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, ONESPAWORLD HOLDINGS Ltd posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (11.5% vs -0.4%). ONESPAWORLD HOLDINGS Ltd produced more free cash flow last quarter ($14.9M vs $-680.1M). Over the past eight quarters, Walker & Dunlop, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (22.1% CAGR vs 7.1%).
Walker & Dunlop, Inc. is one of the largest commercial real estate finance and advisory services firms in the United States and internationally.
OSW vs WD — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $242.1M | $340.0M |
| Net Profit | $12.1M | $-13.9M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 6.8% | -17.2% |
| Net Margin | 5.0% | -12.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 11.5% | -0.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | -16.2% | -131.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.12 | $-0.41 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $242.1M | $340.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $258.5M | $337.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $240.7M | $319.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $219.6M | $237.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $217.2M | $341.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $241.7M | $292.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $224.9M | $270.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $211.2M | $228.1M |
| Q4 25 | $12.1M | $-13.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $24.3M | $33.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $19.9M | $34.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $15.3M | $2.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $14.4M | $44.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $21.6M | $28.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $15.8M | $22.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $21.2M | $11.9M |
| Q4 25 | 6.8% | -17.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.2% | 13.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.2% | 14.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.7% | 2.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.9% | 15.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.3% | 12.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.4% | 10.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.0% | 6.0% |
| Q4 25 | 5.0% | -12.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.4% | 9.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.3% | 10.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.0% | 1.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.6% | 13.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.9% | 9.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.0% | 8.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 10.0% | 5.2% |
| Q4 25 | $0.12 | $-0.41 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.23 | $0.98 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.19 | $0.99 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.15 | $0.08 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.13 | $1.32 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.20 | $0.85 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.15 | $0.67 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.21 | $0.35 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $16.3M | $299.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $84.0M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $542.6M | $1.7B |
| Total Assets | $707.1M | $5.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.15× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $16.3M | $299.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $29.6M | $274.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $35.0M | $233.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $22.6M | $181.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $57.4M | $279.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $48.8M | $179.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $62.5M | $208.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $65.4M | $216.5M |
| Q4 25 | $84.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $85.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $96.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $97.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $98.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $98.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $123.8M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $138.6M | — |
| Q4 25 | $542.6M | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $552.8M | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $548.3M | $1.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $530.6M | $1.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $554.5M | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $540.1M | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $532.7M | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | $515.5M | $1.7B |
| Q4 25 | $707.1M | $5.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $732.6M | $5.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $731.8M | $4.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $708.7M | $4.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $746.4M | $4.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $734.0M | $4.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $756.8M | $4.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $763.6M | $3.8B |
| Q4 25 | 0.15× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.15× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.18× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.18× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.18× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.18× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.23× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.27× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $20.0M | $-664.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $14.9M | $-680.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 6.2% | -200.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.1% | 4.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.65× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $68.4M | $-2.2B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $20.0M | $-664.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $33.2M | $-948.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $20.3M | $-238.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.1M | $-281.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $16.6M | $129.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $28.6M | $-202.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $18.7M | $-237.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $15.0M | $38.4M |
| Q4 25 | $14.9M | $-680.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $27.6M | $-950.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $17.6M | $-241.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.4M | $-284.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $13.2M | $116.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $27.5M | $-204.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $17.6M | $-241.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $13.7M | $35.2M |
| Q4 25 | 6.2% | -200.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.7% | -281.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.3% | -75.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.8% | -120.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.1% | 34.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.4% | -69.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.8% | -89.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.5% | 15.4% |
| Q4 25 | 2.1% | 4.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.2% | 0.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.1% | 0.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.8% | 1.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.5% | 3.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.5% | 0.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.5% | 1.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.6% | 1.4% |
| Q4 25 | 1.65× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.36× | -28.34× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.02× | -7.02× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.66× | -102.07× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.15× | 2.89× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.33× | -7.01× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.19× | -10.49× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.71× | 3.24× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
OSW
| Services | $197.3M | 82% |
| Products | $44.8M | 18% |
WD
Segment breakdown not available.
