vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Ouster, Inc. (OUST) and Plymouth Industrial REIT, Inc. (PLYM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Ouster, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($62.2M vs $51.2M, roughly 1.2× Plymouth Industrial REIT, Inc.). On growth, Ouster, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (106.6% vs -1.4%). Over the past eight quarters, Ouster, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (54.8% CAGR vs 0.4%).
Ouster, Inc. is an American lidar technology company headquartered in San Francisco, California. It builds high-resolution, digital 3D lidar sensors for use in autonomous vehicles, industrial, robotics, drones, mapping, defense, and security systems.
Plymouth Industrial REIT, Inc. is a real estate investment trust focused on owning, operating, and acquiring high-quality industrial properties including distribution centers, warehouses, and light industrial facilities across key U.S. logistics hubs. It serves tenants in e-commerce, retail, manufacturing, and third-party logistics sectors, supporting diverse business supply chain needs.
OUST vs PLYM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $62.2M | $51.2M |
| Net Profit | — | $-54.4M |
| Gross Margin | 60.2% | — |
| Operating Margin | 1.5% | -102.5% |
| Net Margin | — | -106.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 106.6% | -1.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | -248.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.10 | $-1.23 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $62.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $39.5M | $51.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $35.0M | $47.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $32.6M | $45.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $30.1M | $47.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $28.1M | $51.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $27.0M | $48.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $25.9M | $50.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-21.7M | $-54.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-20.6M | $-6.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-22.0M | $5.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $147.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-25.6M | $-15.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-23.9M | $1.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-23.8M | $6.2M |
| Q4 25 | 60.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 42.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 45.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 41.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 43.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 38.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 33.7% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 28.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | 1.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -61.4% | -102.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -76.5% | -10.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -73.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -85.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -98.0% | -29.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | -93.6% | 2.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -99.5% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -55.0% | -106.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -58.8% | -12.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -67.5% | 12.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 309.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -91.1% | -30.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -88.4% | 2.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -91.9% | 12.4% |
| Q4 25 | $0.10 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.37 | $-1.23 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.38 | $-0.14 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.42 | $0.13 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.46 | $3.24 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.54 | $-0.35 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.53 | $0.03 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.55 | $0.14 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $208.6M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $261.7M | $470.1M |
| Total Assets | $349.5M | $1.6B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $208.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $244.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $226.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $168.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $172.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $151.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $184.2M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $187.8M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $646.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $261.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $247.4M | $470.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $221.0M | $539.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $167.9M | $571.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $180.9M | $579.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $171.7M | $436.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $170.6M | $475.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $167.2M | $484.6M |
| Q4 25 | $349.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $353.8M | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $321.8M | $1.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $268.6M | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $276.1M | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $255.2M | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $309.9M | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $317.7M | $1.4B |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.12× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-15.4M | $20.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-37.2M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -59.8% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 35.0% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-64.8M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-15.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-18.3M | $20.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.3M | $23.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-4.9M | $15.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-2.6M | $96.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-3.8M | $17.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-21.6M | $19.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-5.7M | $16.6M |
| Q4 25 | $-37.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-20.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-5.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-4.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-4.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-22.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-7.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | -59.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -50.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -6.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -16.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -13.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -15.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -81.5% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -27.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | 35.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.67× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.65× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 15.12× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.67× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
