vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of OXFORD INDUSTRIES INC (OXM) and PROCORE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. (PCOR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
PROCORE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($349.1M vs $307.3M, roughly 1.1× OXFORD INDUSTRIES INC). PROCORE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. runs the higher net margin — -10.8% vs -20.7%, a 9.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, PROCORE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (15.6% vs -0.2%). PROCORE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($109.2M vs $-47.9M). Over the past eight quarters, PROCORE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (13.8% CAGR vs -3.0%).
Oxford Industries, Inc. is a publicly traded clothing company in the United States that specializes in high-end clothing and apparel. The company carries many major labels, including Tommy Bahama, Lilly Pulitzer, Johnny Was and Southern Tide.
Procore Technologies is an American construction management software as a service company founded in 2002, with headquarters in Carpinteria, California. Procore hosts a platform to connect those involved in the construction industry on a global platform. The software allows for the creation of simplified workflows and displays a consolidated view of construction products that includes the tracking of tasks, management of project workflows, and scheduling.
OXM vs PCOR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $307.3M | $349.1M |
| Net Profit | $-63.7M | $-37.6M |
| Gross Margin | 60.3% | 80.1% |
| Operating Margin | -27.7% | -12.3% |
| Net Margin | -20.7% | -10.8% |
| Revenue YoY | -0.2% | 15.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | -1517.6% | 39.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-4.28 | $-0.25 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $307.3M | $349.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $403.1M | $338.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $392.9M | $323.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $310.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $308.0M | $302.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $419.9M | $295.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $398.2M | $284.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $404.4M | $269.4M |
| Q4 25 | $-63.7M | $-37.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $16.7M | $-9.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $26.2M | $-21.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-33.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-3.9M | $-62.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $40.6M | $-26.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $38.4M | $-6.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-60.1M | $-11.0M |
| Q4 25 | 60.3% | 80.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 61.4% | 79.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 64.2% | 79.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 79.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 63.1% | 81.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 63.1% | 81.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 64.9% | 83.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 60.9% | 83.0% |
| Q4 25 | -27.7% | -12.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.3% | -4.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.2% | -9.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -11.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -2.0% | -21.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 12.5% | -12.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 13.2% | -5.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | -20.1% | -7.0% |
| Q4 25 | -20.7% | -10.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.1% | -2.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.7% | -6.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -10.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -1.3% | -20.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.7% | -8.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.6% | -2.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | -14.9% | -4.1% |
| Q4 25 | $-4.28 | $-0.25 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.12 | $-0.06 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.70 | $-0.14 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-0.22 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.25 | $-0.42 | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.57 | $-0.18 | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.42 | $-0.04 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-3.72 | $-0.08 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $8.0M | $768.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $528.0M | $1.3B |
| Total Assets | $1.3B | $2.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $8.0M | $768.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.9M | $684.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.2M | $620.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $566.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.0M | $775.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $18.4M | $756.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.7M | $735.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.6M | $744.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $29.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | $528.0M | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $597.1M | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $592.4M | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $612.2M | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $621.6M | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $592.9M | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $560.9M | $1.2B |
| Q4 25 | $1.3B | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | $2.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2B | $2.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.1B | $1.9B |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.05× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-9.1M | $114.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-47.9M | $109.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -15.6% | 31.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 12.6% | 1.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-79.9M | $282.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-9.1M | $114.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $83.5M | $88.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.9M | $30.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $66.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-18.2M | $29.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $88.8M | $39.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $32.9M | $58.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $74.9M | $69.1M |
| Q4 25 | $-47.9M | $109.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $52.3M | $83.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-27.4M | $27.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $62.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-56.9M | $17.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $47.2M | $35.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $21.0M | $56.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $55.3M | $67.1M |
| Q4 25 | -15.6% | 31.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.0% | 24.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -7.0% | 8.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 20.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -18.5% | 5.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.2% | 12.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.3% | 20.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 13.7% | 24.9% |
| Q4 25 | 12.6% | 1.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.7% | 1.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.0% | 0.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 12.6% | 3.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.9% | 1.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.0% | 0.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.8% | 0.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.00× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.15× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.19× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.86× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
OXM
| Sales Channel Retail | $162.9M | 53% |
| Sales Channel Wholesale | $61.3M | 20% |
| Johnny Was | $45.4M | 15% |
| Sales Channel Food And Beverage | $29.3M | 10% |
| Other Foreign Countries | $9.0M | 3% |
PCOR
| US | $298.3M | 85% |
| Non Us | $50.9M | 15% |
