vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of OXFORD INDUSTRIES INC (OXM) and ROGERS CORP (ROG). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
OXFORD INDUSTRIES INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($307.3M vs $200.5M, roughly 1.5× ROGERS CORP). ROGERS CORP runs the higher net margin — 2.2% vs -20.7%, a 23.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, ROGERS CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (5.2% vs -0.2%). ROGERS CORP produced more free cash flow last quarter ($1.1M vs $-47.9M). Over the past eight quarters, OXFORD INDUSTRIES INC's revenue compounded faster (-3.0% CAGR vs -3.3%).
Oxford Industries, Inc. is a publicly traded clothing company in the United States that specializes in high-end clothing and apparel. The company carries many major labels, including Tommy Bahama, Lilly Pulitzer, Johnny Was and Southern Tide.
Rogers Corporation is a specialty engineered materials company headquartered in Chandler, Arizona.
OXM vs ROG — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $307.3M | $200.5M |
| Net Profit | $-63.7M | $4.5M |
| Gross Margin | 60.3% | 32.2% |
| Operating Margin | -27.7% | — |
| Net Margin | -20.7% | 2.2% |
| Revenue YoY | -0.2% | 5.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | -1517.6% | 421.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-4.28 | $0.25 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $200.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | $307.3M | $201.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $403.1M | $216.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $392.9M | $202.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $190.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $308.0M | $192.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $419.9M | $210.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $398.2M | $214.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | $4.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-63.7M | $4.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $16.7M | $8.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $26.2M | $-73.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-1.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-3.9M | $-500.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $40.6M | $10.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $38.4M | $8.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | 32.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | 60.3% | 31.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 61.4% | 33.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 64.2% | 31.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 29.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 63.1% | 32.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 63.1% | 35.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 64.9% | 34.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -27.7% | 3.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.3% | 7.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.2% | -33.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -0.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -2.0% | -6.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 12.5% | 6.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 13.2% | 5.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | 2.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | -20.7% | 2.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.1% | 4.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.7% | -36.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -0.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -1.3% | -0.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.7% | 5.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.6% | 3.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.25 | ||
| Q4 25 | $-4.28 | $0.20 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.12 | $0.48 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.70 | $-4.00 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-0.08 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.25 | $-0.04 | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.57 | $0.58 | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.42 | $0.44 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $8.0M | $195.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $528.0M | $1.2B |
| Total Assets | $1.3B | $1.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $195.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $8.0M | $197.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.9M | $167.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.2M | $157.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $175.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.0M | $159.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $18.4M | $146.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.7M | $119.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 25 | $528.0M | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $597.1M | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $592.4M | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $612.2M | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $621.6M | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $592.9M | $1.3B |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.3B | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2B | $1.5B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-9.1M | $5.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-47.9M | $1.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -15.6% | 0.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 12.6% | 2.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.29× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-79.9M | $70.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $5.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-9.1M | $46.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $83.5M | $28.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.9M | $13.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $11.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-18.2M | $33.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $88.8M | $42.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $32.9M | $22.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-47.9M | $42.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $52.3M | $21.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-27.4M | $5.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-56.9M | $18.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $47.2M | $25.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $21.0M | $8.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | -15.6% | 20.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.0% | 9.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -7.0% | 2.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -18.5% | 9.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.2% | 12.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.3% | 4.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | 2.3% | ||
| Q4 25 | 12.6% | 2.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.7% | 3.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.0% | 4.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 5.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 12.6% | 8.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.9% | 8.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.0% | 6.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.29× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 10.20× | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.00× | 3.36× | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.15× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.19× | 3.96× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.86× | 2.83× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
OXM
| Sales Channel Retail | $162.9M | 53% |
| Sales Channel Wholesale | $61.3M | 20% |
| Johnny Was | $45.4M | 15% |
| Sales Channel Food And Beverage | $29.3M | 10% |
| Other Foreign Countries | $9.0M | 3% |
ROG
Segment breakdown not available.
