vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of OXFORD INDUSTRIES INC (OXM) and Smith Douglas Homes Corp. (SDHC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
OXFORD INDUSTRIES INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($307.3M vs $260.4M, roughly 1.2× Smith Douglas Homes Corp.). Smith Douglas Homes Corp. runs the higher net margin — 1.4% vs -20.7%, a 22.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, OXFORD INDUSTRIES INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-0.2% vs -9.4%). Smith Douglas Homes Corp. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($8.7M vs $-47.9M). Over the past eight quarters, Smith Douglas Homes Corp.'s revenue compounded faster (17.3% CAGR vs -3.0%).
Oxford Industries, Inc. is a publicly traded clothing company in the United States that specializes in high-end clothing and apparel. The company carries many major labels, including Tommy Bahama, Lilly Pulitzer, Johnny Was and Southern Tide.
Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. (S&W) is an American firearm manufacturer headquartered in Maryville, Tennessee, United States.
OXM vs SDHC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $307.3M | $260.4M |
| Net Profit | $-63.7M | $3.5M |
| Gross Margin | 60.3% | 19.9% |
| Operating Margin | -27.7% | 6.5% |
| Net Margin | -20.7% | 1.4% |
| Revenue YoY | -0.2% | -9.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | -1517.6% | -14.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-4.28 | $0.39 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $307.3M | $260.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $403.1M | $262.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $392.9M | $223.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $224.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $308.0M | $287.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $419.9M | $277.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $398.2M | $220.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $404.4M | $189.2M |
| Q4 25 | $-63.7M | $3.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $16.7M | $2.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $26.2M | $2.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-3.9M | $4.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $40.6M | $5.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $38.4M | $3.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-60.1M | $3.0M |
| Q4 25 | 60.3% | 19.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 61.4% | 21.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 64.2% | 23.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 23.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 63.1% | 25.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 63.1% | 26.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 64.9% | 26.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 60.9% | 26.1% |
| Q4 25 | -27.7% | 6.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.3% | 6.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.2% | 7.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 8.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -2.0% | 10.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 12.5% | 14.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 13.2% | 11.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -20.1% | 11.3% |
| Q4 25 | -20.7% | 1.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.1% | 0.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.7% | 1.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -1.3% | 1.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.7% | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.6% | 1.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -14.9% | 1.6% |
| Q4 25 | $-4.28 | $0.39 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.12 | $0.24 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.70 | $0.26 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.30 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.25 | $0.50 | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.57 | $0.58 | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.42 | $0.40 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-3.72 | $0.33 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $8.0M | $12.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $528.0M | $86.7M |
| Total Assets | $1.3B | $557.6M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $8.0M | $12.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.9M | $14.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.2M | $16.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $12.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.0M | $22.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $18.4M | $23.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.7M | $17.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.6M | $32.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $29.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | $528.0M | $86.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $597.1M | $82.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $592.4M | $80.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $76.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $612.2M | $73.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $621.6M | $68.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $592.9M | $62.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $560.9M | $59.7M |
| Q4 25 | $1.3B | $557.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | $571.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | $570.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $513.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $475.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | $460.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2B | $429.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.1B | $401.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.05× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-9.1M | $9.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-47.9M | $8.7M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -15.6% | 3.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 12.6% | 0.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 2.77× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-79.9M | $-36.9M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-9.1M | $9.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $83.5M | $22.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.9M | $-28.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-34.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-18.2M | $5.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $88.8M | $22.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $32.9M | $39.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $74.9M | $-9.3M |
| Q4 25 | $-47.9M | $8.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $52.3M | $21.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-27.4M | $-31.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-35.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-56.9M | $4.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $47.2M | $22.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $21.0M | $-2.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $55.3M | $-9.7M |
| Q4 25 | -15.6% | 3.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.0% | 8.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -7.0% | -13.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -16.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -18.5% | 1.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.2% | 8.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.3% | -1.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 13.7% | -5.1% |
| Q4 25 | 12.6% | 0.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.7% | 0.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.0% | 0.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 12.6% | 0.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.9% | 0.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.0% | 1.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.8% | 0.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | 2.77× | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.00× | 10.70× | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.15× | -12.24× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -13.01× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.33× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.19× | 4.28× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.86× | 0.01× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -3.12× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
OXM
| Sales Channel Retail | $162.9M | 53% |
| Sales Channel Wholesale | $61.3M | 20% |
| Johnny Was | $45.4M | 15% |
| Sales Channel Food And Beverage | $29.3M | 10% |
| Other Foreign Countries | $9.0M | 3% |
SDHC
| Southeast | $164.7M | 63% |
| Central | $95.8M | 37% |
