vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of OXFORD INDUSTRIES INC (OXM) and Bio-Techne (TECH). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
OXFORD INDUSTRIES INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($307.3M vs $295.9M, roughly 1.0× Bio-Techne). Bio-Techne runs the higher net margin — 12.8% vs -20.7%, a 33.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, OXFORD INDUSTRIES INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-0.2% vs -6.4%). Over the past eight quarters, Bio-Techne's revenue compounded faster (4.2% CAGR vs -3.0%).
Oxford Industries, Inc. is a publicly traded clothing company in the United States that specializes in high-end clothing and apparel. The company carries many major labels, including Tommy Bahama, Lilly Pulitzer, Johnny Was and Southern Tide.
Bio-Techne Corporation is an American life sciences company that develops, manufactures and sells life science reagents, instruments and services for the research, diagnostic, and bioprocessing markets.
OXM vs TECH — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q2 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $307.3M | $295.9M |
| Net Profit | $-63.7M | $38.0M |
| Gross Margin | 60.3% | 64.6% |
| Operating Margin | -27.7% | 18.4% |
| Net Margin | -20.7% | 12.8% |
| Revenue YoY | -0.2% | -6.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | -1517.6% | 68.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-4.28 | $0.24 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $307.3M | $295.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $403.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $392.9M | $317.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $316.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $308.0M | $297.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $419.9M | $289.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $398.2M | $306.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $404.4M | $303.4M |
| Q4 25 | $-63.7M | $38.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $16.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $26.2M | $-17.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $22.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-3.9M | $34.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $40.6M | $33.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $38.4M | $40.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-60.1M | $49.1M |
| Q4 25 | 60.3% | 64.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 61.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 64.2% | 62.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 67.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 63.1% | 65.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 63.1% | 63.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 64.9% | 66.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 60.9% | 67.4% |
| Q4 25 | -27.7% | 18.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.2% | -7.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 12.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -2.0% | 16.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 12.5% | 13.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 13.2% | 15.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | -20.1% | 22.1% |
| Q4 25 | -20.7% | 12.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.7% | -5.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 7.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -1.3% | 11.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.7% | 11.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.6% | 13.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | -14.9% | 16.2% |
| Q4 25 | $-4.28 | $0.24 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.12 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.70 | $-0.11 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.14 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.25 | $0.22 | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.57 | $0.21 | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.42 | $0.26 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-3.72 | $0.31 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $8.0M | $172.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $260.0M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $528.0M | $2.0B |
| Total Assets | $1.3B | $2.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.13× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $8.0M | $172.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.2M | $162.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $140.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.0M | $177.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $18.4M | $187.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.7M | $152.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.6M | $145.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | $260.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $346.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $330.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $300.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $300.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $319.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $29.0M | $389.0M |
| Q4 25 | $528.0M | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $597.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $592.4M | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $612.2M | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $621.6M | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $592.9M | $2.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $560.9M | $2.0B |
| Q4 25 | $1.3B | $2.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | $2.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $2.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | $2.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2B | $2.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.1B | $2.7B |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.13× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.18× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.16× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.14× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.14× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.15× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.05× | 0.19× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-9.1M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-47.9M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -15.6% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 12.6% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-79.9M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-9.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $83.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.9M | $98.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $41.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-18.2M | $84.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $88.8M | $63.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $32.9M | $75.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $74.9M | $81.0M |
| Q4 25 | $-47.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $52.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-27.4M | $93.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $31.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-56.9M | $77.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $47.2M | $54.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $21.0M | $57.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $55.3M | $64.5M |
| Q4 25 | -15.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -7.0% | 29.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 9.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -18.5% | 26.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.2% | 18.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.3% | 18.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 13.7% | 21.3% |
| Q4 25 | 12.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.0% | 1.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 3.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 12.6% | 2.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.9% | 3.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.0% | 5.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.8% | 5.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.00× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.15× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.82× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.42× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.19× | 1.90× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.86× | 1.86× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.65× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
OXM
| Sales Channel Retail | $162.9M | 53% |
| Sales Channel Wholesale | $61.3M | 20% |
| Johnny Was | $45.4M | 15% |
| Sales Channel Food And Beverage | $29.3M | 10% |
| Other Foreign Countries | $9.0M | 3% |
TECH
| Diagnostics And Spatial Biology | $81.2M | 27% |
| EMEA Excluding UK | $75.4M | 25% |
| Other | $42.4M | 14% |
| Instruments | $29.6M | 10% |
| APAC Excluding Greater China | $22.7M | 8% |
| Services | $22.3M | 8% |
| GB | $13.7M | 5% |
| Royalty | $8.5M | 3% |
