vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of PAN AMERICAN SILVER CORP (PAAS) and Veralto (VLTO). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
PAN AMERICAN SILVER CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.8B vs $1.4B, roughly 2.0× Veralto).
Pan American Silver Corporation is a mining company based in Canada with operations in Latin America. The company has mines and other projects in Mexico, Peru, Bolivia, and Argentina.
Veralto Corporation is an American technology company headquartered in Waltham, Massachusetts. It produces products related to water analytics, water treatment, marking and coding, and packaging and color.
PAAS vs VLTO — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2022 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.8B | $1.4B |
| Net Profit | — | $254.0M |
| Gross Margin | 27.0% | 60.1% |
| Operating Margin | — | 23.8% |
| Net Margin | — | 17.9% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 6.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 12.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-1.05 | $1.02 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.2B |
| Q1 26 | — | $254.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $239.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $222.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $225.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $227.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $219.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $203.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $184.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | 60.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 60.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 60.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 60.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 59.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 59.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 60.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 60.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | 23.8% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 23.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 22.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 24.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 22.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 23.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 23.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 23.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | 17.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 17.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 16.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 16.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 16.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 16.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 15.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 14.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.02 | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $0.95 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.89 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.90 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.91 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.88 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.81 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $0.74 |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $182.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $170.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 12.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 0.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 0.72× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $893.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $182.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $270.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $339.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $157.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $285.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $224.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $251.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $115.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | $170.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $258.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $323.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $142.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $263.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $215.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $240.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $102.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | 12.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 18.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 23.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 10.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 19.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 16.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 18.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 8.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.8% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.72× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 1.13× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.53× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.70× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.26× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.02× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.24× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.63× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
