vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of PROSPERITY BANCSHARES INC (PB) and DOUGLAS DYNAMICS, INC (PLOW). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
PROSPERITY BANCSHARES INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($367.6M vs $184.5M, roughly 2.0× DOUGLAS DYNAMICS, INC). PROSPERITY BANCSHARES INC runs the higher net margin — 31.6% vs 7.0%, a 24.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. Over the past eight quarters, DOUGLAS DYNAMICS, INC's revenue compounded faster (38.9% CAGR vs 19.2%).
Prosperity Bancshares, Inc. is a bank holding company headquartered in Houston, Texas with operations in Texas and central Oklahoma. As of December 31, 2019, the company operated 285 branches: 65 in the Houston area, including The Woodlands, Texas; 30 in South Texas, including Corpus Christi, Texas and Victoria, Texas; 75 in the Dallas–Fort Worth metroplex; 22 in East Texas; 29 in Central Texas, including Austin, Texas and San Antonio; 34 in West Texas, including Lubbock, Texas, Midland–Odess...
General Dynamics Corporation (GD) is an American industrial and technology company based in Reston, Virginia. It is primarily a developer and producer of advanced military equipment of a wide variety, such as nuclear submarines, main battle tanks, and armoured fighting vehicles. It is also the manufacturer of the civilian aviation Gulfstream business jets and a provider of information technology services. The company is the 3rd largest of the top 100 contractors of the U.S. federal government...
PB vs PLOW — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $367.6M | $184.5M |
| Net Profit | $116.3M | $12.8M |
| Gross Margin | — | 26.1% |
| Operating Margin | — | 10.5% |
| Net Margin | 31.6% | 7.0% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 28.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | -10.7% | 62.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.16 | $0.54 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $367.6M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $275.0M | $184.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $273.4M | $162.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $267.7M | $194.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $265.4M | $115.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $267.8M | $143.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $261.7M | $129.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $258.8M | $199.9M |
| Q1 26 | $116.3M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $139.9M | $12.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $137.6M | $8.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $135.2M | $26.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $130.2M | $148.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $130.1M | $7.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $127.3M | $32.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $111.6M | $24.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 26.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 23.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 31.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 24.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 24.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 23.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 30.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 65.1% | 10.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 64.4% | 8.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 64.3% | 19.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 62.7% | 2.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 62.0% | 9.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 62.1% | 35.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 55.2% | 18.2% |
| Q1 26 | 31.6% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 50.9% | 7.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 50.3% | 4.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 50.5% | 13.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 49.1% | 0.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 48.6% | 5.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 48.6% | 24.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 43.1% | 12.2% |
| Q1 26 | $1.16 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.48 | $0.54 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.45 | $0.33 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.42 | $1.09 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.37 | $0.00 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.36 | $0.35 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.34 | $1.36 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.17 | $1.02 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $144.0M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $8.2B | $281.4M |
| Total Assets | $43.6B | $626.7M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.51× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $144.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $147.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | $8.2B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $7.6B | $281.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.7B | $275.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.6B | $273.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.5B | $258.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.4B | $264.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.4B | $260.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.3B | $236.7M |
| Q1 26 | $43.6B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $38.5B | $626.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $38.3B | $694.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $38.4B | $671.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $38.8B | $621.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $39.6B | $590.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $40.1B | $665.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $39.8B | $617.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.51× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.56× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $95.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $92.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 50.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 1.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 7.47× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $63.6M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $78.3M | $95.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $194.8M | $-8.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $98.2M | $-11.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $178.2M | $-1.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-205.8M | $74.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $274.6M | $-14.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $216.5M | $2.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $68.5M | $92.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $185.7M | $-11.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $91.8M | $-14.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $171.1M | $-3.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-210.7M | $70.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $270.2M | $-15.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $211.8M | $836.0K |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 24.9% | 50.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 67.9% | -7.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 34.3% | -7.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 64.5% | -3.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -78.7% | 48.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 103.3% | -11.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 81.8% | 0.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.6% | 1.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.3% | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.4% | 1.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.7% | 1.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.8% | 2.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.7% | 0.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.8% | 0.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.56× | 7.47× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.42× | -1.07× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.73× | -0.44× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.37× | -9.03× | ||
| Q4 24 | -1.58× | 9.41× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.16× | -0.44× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.94× | 0.10× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
PB
| Net Interest Income | $321.1M | 87% |
| Noninterest Income | $46.5M | 13% |
PLOW
| Work Truck Solutions | $101.5M | 55% |
| Transferred At Point In Time | $83.1M | 45% |