vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of PCB BANCORP (PCB) and SolarMax Technology, Inc. (SMXT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
SolarMax Technology, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($46.6M vs $29.2M, roughly 1.6× PCB BANCORP). On growth, SolarMax Technology, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (623.5% vs 11.3%).
PCB Bank is an American community bank that focuses on the Korean-American community based in California and offers commercial banking services. It has branches in 8 states and is the third largest Korean American Bank after Bank of Hope and Hanmi Bank.
SolarMax Technology, Inc. develops, manufactures and sells high-efficiency solar PV modules and clean energy systems. It serves residential, commercial and industrial clients in North America and key Asia-Pacific markets, offering installation and after-sales support to boost low-carbon energy use.
PCB vs SMXT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $29.2M | $46.6M |
| Net Profit | — | $-872.2K |
| Gross Margin | — | 2.7% |
| Operating Margin | 45.0% | -2.7% |
| Net Margin | — | -1.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 11.3% | 623.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 77.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.65 | $-0.02 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $29.2M | $46.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $30.4M | $30.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $29.3M | $6.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $26.9M | $6.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $26.2M | $6.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $25.3M | $6.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $24.2M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $23.9M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $-872.2K | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.4M | $-2.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.1M | $-1.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.7M | $-1.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-3.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.8M | $-9.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.3M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.7M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 2.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 8.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 20.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 14.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 19.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | 45.0% | -2.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 52.3% | -6.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 43.3% | -25.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 40.2% | -16.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 39.3% | -27.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 42.2% | -158.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 36.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 27.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | -1.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 37.5% | -7.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 31.0% | -27.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 28.8% | -18.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -60.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 30.8% | -152.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 25.9% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 19.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | $0.65 | $-0.02 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.78 | $-0.04 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.62 | $-0.04 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.53 | $-0.03 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.46 | $-0.07 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.52 | $-0.21 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.43 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.33 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $207.1M | $8.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $390.0M | $-12.2M |
| Total Assets | $3.3B | $91.3M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $207.1M | $8.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $369.5M | $5.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $263.6M | $1.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $214.3M | $6.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $198.8M | $7.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $193.1M | $8.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $177.6M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $239.8M | — |
| Q4 25 | $390.0M | $-12.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $384.5M | $-11.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $376.5M | $-15.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $370.9M | $-15.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $363.8M | $-15.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $362.3M | $-10.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $353.5M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $350.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | $3.3B | $91.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.4B | $58.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.3B | $38.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.2B | $38.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.1B | $38.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.9B | $43.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.9B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.9B | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $26.6M | $-2.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $24.4M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 83.6% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 7.5% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $46.0M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $26.6M | $-2.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $16.4M | $3.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.9M | $220.7K | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.3M | $-601.1K | ||
| Q4 24 | $39.0M | $-1.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.9M | $203.6K | ||
| Q2 24 | $14.6M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $8.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | $24.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $16.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $34.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $12.8M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | 83.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 53.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 133.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 46.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 53.1% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 25.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | 7.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 15.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.1% | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 9.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.44× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.54× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.30× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.52× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.33× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.76× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
PCB
Segment breakdown not available.
SMXT
| Yabucoa | $35.9M | 77% |
| Other | $10.7M | 23% |
