vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of PCB BANCORP (PCB) and Zevia PBC (ZVIA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Zevia PBC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($37.9M vs $29.2M, roughly 1.3× PCB BANCORP). On growth, PCB BANCORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (11.3% vs -4.0%). Over the past eight quarters, PCB BANCORP's revenue compounded faster (10.4% CAGR vs -1.2%).
PCB Bank is an American community bank that focuses on the Korean-American community based in California and offers commercial banking services. It has branches in 8 states and is the third largest Korean American Bank after Bank of Hope and Hanmi Bank.
Zevia is a Los Angeles based company that produces soft drinks, organic tea, energy drinks, and mixers sweetened with stevia. All Zevia products are zero-calorie, sugar-free, gluten free, vegan, certified kosher, and certified by The Non-GMO Project. In June 2021, Zevia filed to go public with an IPO.
PCB vs ZVIA — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $29.2M | $37.9M |
| Net Profit | — | $-1.3M |
| Gross Margin | — | 47.7% |
| Operating Margin | 45.0% | -4.0% |
| Net Margin | — | -3.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 11.3% | -4.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 80.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.65 | $-0.02 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $29.2M | $37.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $30.4M | $40.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $29.3M | $44.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $26.9M | $38.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $26.2M | $39.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $25.3M | $36.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $24.2M | $40.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $23.9M | $38.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-1.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.4M | $-2.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.1M | $-651.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.7M | $-6.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-6.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.8M | $-2.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.3M | $-7.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.7M | $-7.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | 47.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 45.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 48.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 50.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 49.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 49.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 41.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 45.7% |
| Q4 25 | 45.0% | -4.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 52.3% | -7.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 43.3% | -2.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 40.2% | -16.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 39.3% | -16.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 42.2% | -8.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 36.3% | -17.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 27.2% | -18.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | -3.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 37.5% | -6.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 31.0% | -1.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 28.8% | -16.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -17.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 30.8% | -6.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 25.9% | -17.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 19.6% | -18.6% |
| Q4 25 | $0.65 | $-0.02 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.78 | $-0.04 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.62 | $-0.01 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.53 | $-0.08 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.46 | $-0.10 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.52 | $-0.04 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.43 | $-0.10 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.33 | $-0.10 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $207.1M | $25.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $390.0M | $51.0M |
| Total Assets | $3.3B | $63.6M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $207.1M | $25.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $369.5M | $26.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $263.6M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $214.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $198.8M | $30.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $193.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $177.6M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $239.8M | — |
| Q4 25 | $390.0M | $51.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $384.5M | $51.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $376.5M | $53.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $370.9M | $53.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $363.8M | $64.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $362.3M | $72.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $353.5M | $75.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $350.0M | $80.3M |
| Q4 25 | $3.3B | $63.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.4B | $60.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.3B | $62.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.2B | $62.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.1B | $68.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.9B | $72.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.9B | $72.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.9B | $85.1M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $26.6M | $-507.0K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $24.4M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 83.6% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 7.5% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $46.0M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $26.6M | $-507.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $16.4M | $116.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.9M | $-1.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.3M | $-2.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $39.0M | $-2.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.9M | $3.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $14.6M | $282.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $8.2M | $-3.2M |
| Q4 25 | $24.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $16.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $34.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $12.8M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | 83.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 53.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 133.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 46.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 53.1% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 25.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | 7.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 15.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 9.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.44× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.54× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.30× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.52× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.33× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.76× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
