vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of POTLATCHDELTIC CORP (PCH) and WYNDHAM HOTELS & RESORTS, INC. (WH). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
WYNDHAM HOTELS & RESORTS, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($334.0M vs $314.2M, roughly 1.1× POTLATCHDELTIC CORP). POTLATCHDELTIC CORP runs the higher net margin — 8.2% vs -18.0%, a 26.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, POTLATCHDELTIC CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (23.1% vs -76.3%). WYNDHAM HOTELS & RESORTS, INC. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($168.0M vs $50.1M). Over the past eight quarters, POTLATCHDELTIC CORP's revenue compounded faster (11.1% CAGR vs -4.6%).
POTLATCHDELTIC CORPPCHEarnings & Financial Report
PotlatchDeltic Corporation is an American diversified forest products company based in Spokane, Washington.
Wyndham Hotels & Resorts, Inc., is an American hospitality company based in Parsippany, New Jersey, United States. It describes itself as the largest hotel franchisor in the world, with 9,100 locations.
PCH vs WH — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $314.2M | $334.0M |
| Net Profit | $25.9M | $-60.0M |
| Gross Margin | 18.2% | — |
| Operating Margin | 11.2% | — |
| Net Margin | 8.2% | -18.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 23.1% | -76.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | 682.5% | -170.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.33 | $-0.80 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $334.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $334.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $314.2M | $382.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $275.0M | $397.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $268.3M | $316.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $258.1M | $336.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $255.1M | $396.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $320.7M | $367.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | $-60.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $-60.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $25.9M | $105.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.4M | $87.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $25.8M | $61.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.2M | $85.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.3M | $102.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $13.7M | $86.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 18.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 17.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.9% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | -11.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.2% | 46.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.0% | 37.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 10.3% | 35.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.2% | 38.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.8% | 43.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.4% | 39.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | -18.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | -18.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.2% | 27.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.7% | 21.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.6% | 19.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.0% | 25.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.3% | 25.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.3% | 23.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | $-0.80 | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $-0.77 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.33 | $1.36 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.09 | $1.13 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.33 | $0.78 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.07 | $1.06 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.04 | $1.29 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.17 | $1.07 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $88.8M | $64.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.9B | $468.0M |
| Total Assets | $3.2B | $4.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $64.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $64.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $88.8M | $70.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $95.3M | $50.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $147.5M | $48.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $151.6M | $103.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $161.1M | $72.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $199.7M | $70.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $2.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.0B | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.4B |
| Q1 26 | — | $468.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $468.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.9B | $583.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9B | $570.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.0B | $579.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.0B | $650.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1B | $583.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.1B | $623.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | $4.2B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $4.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.2B | $4.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.2B | $4.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.3B | $4.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.3B | $4.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.3B | $4.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.4B | $4.2B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 5.37× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 4.43× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 4.44× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 4.29× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.51× | 3.72× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 4.19× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 3.83× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $65.7M | $367.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $50.1M | $168.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 15.9% | 50.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 4.9% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 2.54× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $132.4M | $437.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $367.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $152.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $65.7M | $86.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $41.0M | $70.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $49.1M | $59.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $45.4M | $134.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $26.5M | $79.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $100.6M | $1.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | $168.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $136.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $50.1M | $75.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $30.6M | $58.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $26.3M | $52.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $25.4M | $109.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-8.2M | $71.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $72.4M | $-6.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | 50.3% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 40.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.9% | 19.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.1% | 14.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.8% | 16.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.9% | 32.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | -3.2% | 17.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 22.6% | -1.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 4.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.9% | 2.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.8% | 3.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.5% | 2.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.7% | 7.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.6% | 2.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.8% | 1.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.54× | 0.82× | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.58× | 0.80× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.90× | 0.97× | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.74× | 1.58× | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.99× | 0.77× | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.35× | 0.01× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
PCH
| Lumber | $131.8M | 42% |
| Timberlands | $52.5M | 17% |
| Rural Real Estate | $51.3M | 16% |
| Residuals And Panels | $34.0M | 11% |
| Pulpwood | $16.7M | 5% |
| Development Real Estate | $14.6M | 5% |
| Other | $8.1M | 3% |
| Other Products | $5.2M | 2% |
WH
| Fee-related and other revenues | $334.0M | 100% |
| Management and other fees | $2.0M | 1% |
