vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of PicoCELA Inc. (PCLA) and UDR, Inc. (UDR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
UDR, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($425.8M vs $252.6M, roughly 1.7× PicoCELA Inc.). UDR, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 44.6% vs -125.2%, a 169.8% gap on every dollar of revenue.
PicoCELA Inc. is a global technology company specializing in low-power, high-reliability wireless connectivity solutions, including Wi-Fi HaLow modules and edge network infrastructure. It caters to industrial IoT, smart city, retail, and smart home segments, with a primary operational footprint across Asia, North America, and European markets.
UDR, Inc. is a leading U.S.-headquartered real estate investment trust specializing in owning, operating, and redeveloping high-quality multifamily residential apartment communities. It operates across major U.S. metropolitan markets, catering to a diverse tenant base including young professionals, families, and middle-to-high income households.
PCLA vs UDR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $252.6M | $425.8M |
| Net Profit | $-316.2M | $189.8M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | -114.8% | 54.0% |
| Net Margin | -125.2% | 44.6% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 0.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 147.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $0.63 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $425.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $433.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $431.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $425.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $252.6M | $421.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $422.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $420.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $415.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | $189.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $222.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $40.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $37.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-316.2M | $76.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-5.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $22.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $28.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | 54.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 64.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 17.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 18.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -114.8% | 29.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 15.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 16.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 16.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | 44.6% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 51.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 9.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 8.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -125.2% | 18.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -220.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 5.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 7.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.63 | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $0.67 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.12 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.11 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.23 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-0.01 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.06 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.08 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $456.8M | $1.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $354.8M | $3.3B |
| Total Assets | $1.2B | $10.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $1.3M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $1.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $456.8M | $1.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $5.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $5.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $5.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $5.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $5.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $5.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $5.8B |
| Q1 26 | — | $3.3B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $3.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $3.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $3.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $354.8M | $3.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $3.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $3.7B |
| Q1 26 | — | $10.3B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $10.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $10.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $10.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | $10.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $10.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $11.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $11.1B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 1.77× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.78× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.74× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.74× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.69× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.67× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.55× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-245.6M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-256.6M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -101.6% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 4.3% | 4.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $902.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $234.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $250.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-245.6M | $156.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $876.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $230.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $238.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $650.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $164.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $190.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-256.6M | $103.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $627.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $161.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $171.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 150.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 38.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 44.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -101.6% | 24.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 148.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 38.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 41.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | 4.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 58.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 16.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 14.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.3% | 12.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 59.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 16.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 16.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 4.05× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 5.81× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 6.64× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.04× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 10.19× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 8.26× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
PCLA
| Revenue from product | $179.1M | 71% |
| Revenue from SaaS, Maintenance and others | $42.4M | 17% |
| Revenue from product – related party | $31.0M | 12% |
UDR
| Rental income | $423.3M | 99% |
| Joint venture management and other fees | $2.5M | 1% |
