vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of PURE CYCLE CORP (PCYO) and TRANSACT TECHNOLOGIES INC (TACT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
TRANSACT TECHNOLOGIES INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($11.5M vs $9.1M, roughly 1.3× PURE CYCLE CORP). On growth, PURE CYCLE CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (58.8% vs 11.9%). Over the past eight quarters, PURE CYCLE CORP's revenue compounded faster (69.0% CAGR vs 3.5%).
Pure Cycles, is a bicycle company based in Los Angeles, California that was founded by Michael Fishman, Jordan Schau, Zachary Schau and Austin Stoffers in 2010, as Pure Fix Cycles.
Roper Technologies, Inc. is a holding company that owns companies in the technology sector.
PCYO vs TACT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $9.1M | $11.5M |
| Net Profit | $4.6M | — |
| Gross Margin | 68.4% | 47.6% |
| Operating Margin | 48.0% | -10.1% |
| Net Margin | 50.0% | — |
| Revenue YoY | 58.8% | 11.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | 16.0% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.19 | $-0.11 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $9.1M | $11.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.2M | $13.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.1M | $13.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.0M | $13.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.8M | $10.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.6M | $10.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.6M | $11.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.2M | $10.7M |
| Q4 25 | $4.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.1M | $15.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.3M | $-143.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $809.0K | $19.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.6M | $-551.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.8M | $-319.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $118.0K | $-1.0M |
| Q4 25 | 68.4% | 47.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 67.7% | 49.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 63.4% | 48.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 38.2% | 48.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 63.8% | 44.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 77.8% | 48.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 64.0% | 52.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 55.6% | 52.6% |
| Q4 25 | 48.0% | -10.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 53.1% | 0.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 26.0% | -1.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -33.2% | -0.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 29.9% | -10.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 62.0% | -7.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 40.3% | -3.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | -11.5% | -12.2% |
| Q4 25 | 50.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 54.5% | 0.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 43.9% | -1.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 20.3% | 0.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 68.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 52.6% | -5.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 37.2% | -2.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.7% | -9.7% |
| Q4 25 | $0.19 | $-0.11 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.26 | $0.00 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.09 | $-0.01 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.03 | $0.00 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.16 | $-0.80 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.27 | $-0.06 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.12 | $-0.03 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.00 | $-0.10 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $17.1M | $20.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $8.0M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $147.5M | $31.1M |
| Total Assets | $168.1M | $44.8M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.05× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $17.1M | $20.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $21.9M | $20.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $14.4M | $17.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $16.5M | $14.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $19.0M | $14.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $22.1M | $11.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $20.5M | $11.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $20.6M | $10.6M |
| Q4 25 | $8.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $147.5M | $31.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $142.7M | $31.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $136.7M | $31.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $134.4M | $30.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $133.6M | $30.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $129.7M | $38.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $123.2M | $38.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $120.4M | $38.6M |
| Q4 25 | $168.1M | $44.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $162.3M | $45.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $151.7M | $44.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $149.7M | $44.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $149.7M | $44.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $147.4M | $50.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $140.4M | $50.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $135.2M | $51.9M |
| Q4 25 | 0.05× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.05× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.05× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.05× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.05× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.05× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-979.0K | $609.0K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $589.0K |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 5.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 0.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -0.21× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $7.6M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-979.0K | $609.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.4M | $3.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-503.0K | $3.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.4M | $-161.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.7M | $2.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.1M | $327.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $892.0K | $636.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-457.0K | $-1.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | $589.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $3.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $3.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-171.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $259.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $499.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-1.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | 5.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 27.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 25.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -1.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 23.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 4.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -14.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.0% |
| Q4 25 | -0.21× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.53× | 242.00× | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.22× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -1.70× | -8.47× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.44× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.47× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.32× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -3.87× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
PCYO
| Construction | $6.5M | 71% |
| Water And Wastewater Resource Development Segment | $2.5M | 27% |
TACT
Segment breakdown not available.
