vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Ponce Financial Group, Inc. (PDLB) and DNA X, Inc. (SONM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Ponce Financial Group, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($31.4M vs $16.2M, roughly 1.9× DNA X, Inc.). Ponce Financial Group, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 36.3% vs -29.3%, a 65.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Ponce Financial Group, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (37.6% vs 7.9%). Over the past eight quarters, Ponce Financial Group, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (23.7% CAGR vs 9.9%).
Ponce Financial Group, Inc. is a U.S.-based financial holding company operating Ponce Bank as its core subsidiary. It serves multicultural, immigrant and low-to-moderate income communities in the New York metro area, offering retail and commercial banking products including deposits, mortgages, small business financing and personal credit.
PDLB vs SONM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $31.4M | $16.2M |
| Net Profit | $10.1M | $-4.8M |
| Gross Margin | — | 11.2% |
| Operating Margin | 43.6% | -24.5% |
| Net Margin | 36.3% | -29.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 37.6% | 7.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | 245.6% | -89.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.43 | $-4.83 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $31.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $26.7M | $16.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $26.5M | $11.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $24.6M | $16.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $22.8M | $15.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $20.2M | $15.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $20.2M | $11.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $20.5M | $9.1M |
| Q4 25 | $10.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.5M | $-4.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.1M | $-7.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.0M | $458.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.9M | $-21.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.4M | $-2.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.2M | $-6.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.4M | $-2.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 11.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 7.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 50.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -1.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 28.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 25.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 31.8% |
| Q4 25 | 43.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 32.8% | -24.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 30.2% | -60.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 32.5% | 3.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.6% | 55.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.2% | -15.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 21.8% | -56.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 18.3% | -29.5% |
| Q4 25 | 36.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 24.3% | -29.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 23.0% | -66.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 24.2% | 2.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 14.1% | -141.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 12.1% | -16.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 15.8% | -57.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 11.8% | -31.9% |
| Q4 25 | $0.43 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.27 | $-4.83 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.25 | $-0.79 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.25 | $0.08 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.11 | $-116.99 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.10 | $-9.32 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.14 | $-1.41 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.11 | $-0.65 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $126.2M | $2.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $596.1M | $5.1M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $541.5M | $-701.0K |
| Total Assets | $3.2B | $40.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.10× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $126.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $146.6M | $2.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $126.6M | $2.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $129.9M | $2.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $139.8M | $5.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $155.8M | $9.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $103.2M | $9.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $134.7M | $9.3M |
| Q4 25 | $596.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $521.1M | $5.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $536.1M | $2.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $521.1M | $2.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $596.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $580.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $680.4M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $680.4M | — |
| Q4 25 | $541.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $529.8M | $-701.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $521.1M | $-1.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $513.9M | $-1.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $505.5M | $-5.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $504.6M | $15.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $497.7M | $17.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $493.7M | $19.8M |
| Q4 25 | $3.2B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.2B | $40.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.2B | $36.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.1B | $36.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.0B | $39.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.0B | $49.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.8B | $45.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.8B | $42.4M |
| Q4 25 | 1.10× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.98× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.03× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.01× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.18× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.15× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.37× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.38× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $55.6M | $-7.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $54.6M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 173.9% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.1% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 5.48× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $74.3M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $55.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.4M | $-7.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.2M | $-4.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $13.1M | $-9.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.2M | $-4.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-14.6M | $-417.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.6M | $-3.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.5M | $-168.0K |
| Q4 25 | $54.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $786.0K | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $12.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.5M | $-4.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-15.0M | $-554.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.6M | $-3.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-315.0K | $-198.0K |
| Q4 25 | 173.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 22.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 52.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.7% | -29.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -74.1% | -3.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -13.0% | -29.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | -1.5% | -2.2% |
| Q4 25 | 3.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.9% | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.0% | 0.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.3% | 0.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.7% | 0.3% |
| Q4 25 | 5.48× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.21× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.01× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.20× | -20.97× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.46× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -5.99× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.80× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.61× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
