vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Piedmont Realty Trust, Inc. (PDM) and STURM RUGER & CO INC (RGR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
STURM RUGER & CO INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($151.1M vs $142.9M, roughly 1.1× Piedmont Realty Trust, Inc.). On growth, STURM RUGER & CO INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (3.6% vs -0.3%). Over the past eight quarters, STURM RUGER & CO INC's revenue compounded faster (5.1% CAGR vs -0.6%).
Piedmont Realty Trust, Inc. is a publicly traded real estate investment trust (REIT) that owns, operates, and invests in high-quality office properties primarily located in high-growth metropolitan areas across the United States. It serves corporate tenants across multiple industry sectors including technology, professional services, and healthcare, and pursues stable long-term returns for stakeholders via strategic property management and portfolio optimization.
Sturm, Ruger & Company, Inc., better known by the shortened name Ruger, is an American firearm manufacturing company based in Southport, Connecticut, with production facilities also in Newport, New Hampshire; Mayodan, North Carolina; and Prescott, Arizona. The company was founded in 1949 by Alexander McCormick Sturm and William B. Ruger and has been publicly traded since 1969.
PDM vs RGR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $142.9M | $151.1M |
| Net Profit | $-43.2M | — |
| Gross Margin | — | 17.8% |
| Operating Margin | — | 2.3% |
| Net Margin | -30.3% | — |
| Revenue YoY | -0.3% | 3.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | -44.3% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.34 | $0.22 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $142.9M | $151.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $139.2M | $126.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $140.3M | $132.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $142.7M | $135.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $143.2M | $145.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $139.3M | $122.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $143.3M | $130.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $144.5M | $136.8M |
| Q4 25 | $-43.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-13.5M | $1.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-16.8M | $-17.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-10.1M | $7.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-30.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-11.5M | $4.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-9.8M | $8.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-27.8M | $7.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | 17.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 15.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 3.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 22.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 22.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 18.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 22.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 21.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | 2.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -2.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -15.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 6.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 7.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 6.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 5.5% |
| Q4 25 | -30.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -9.7% | 1.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -12.0% | -13.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -7.1% | 5.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -20.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -8.3% | 3.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -6.8% | 6.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | -19.2% | 5.2% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.34 | $0.22 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.11 | $0.10 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.14 | $-1.05 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.08 | $0.46 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.25 | $0.62 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.09 | $0.28 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.08 | $0.47 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.22 | $0.40 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $731.0K | $92.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $2.2B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.5B | $283.8M |
| Total Assets | $4.0B | $342.0M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.49× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $731.0K | $92.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.0M | $80.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.3M | $101.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.9M | $108.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $109.6M | $105.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $133.6M | $96.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $138.5M | $105.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.5M | $115.3M |
| Q4 25 | $2.2B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.2B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.2B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.2B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.2B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.2B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.2B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.1B | — |
| Q4 25 | $1.5B | $283.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | $279.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5B | $289.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.6B | $321.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6B | $319.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6B | $314.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7B | $321.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.7B | $332.0M |
| Q4 25 | $4.0B | $342.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.0B | $342.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.0B | $349.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.0B | $379.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.1B | $384.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.1B | $373.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.2B | $376.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.0B | $385.0M |
| Q4 25 | 1.49× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.43× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.41× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.40× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.40× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.36× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.34× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.23× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $140.6M | $15.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $12.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 8.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 2.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $38.5M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $140.6M | $15.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $35.8M | $12.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $50.1M | $14.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.7M | $11.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $198.1M | $20.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $42.9M | $9.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $66.8M | $18.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $23.4M | $7.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | $12.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $7.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $9.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $10.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $16.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $10.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $5.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | 8.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 5.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 6.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 7.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 11.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 7.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 4.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | 2.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 4.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 4.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 5.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 6.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 8.15× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.43× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.98× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.27× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.04× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
PDM
| Atlanta GA | $45.7M | 32% |
| Dallas TX | $24.1M | 17% |
| Orlando FL | $19.3M | 13% |
| New York NY | $14.7M | 10% |
| Northern Virginia Washington D.C. | $12.9M | 9% |
| Minneapolis MN | $11.4M | 8% |
| Boston MA | $9.8M | 7% |
| Real Estate Other | $7.8M | 5% |
RGR
| Firearms | $150.6M | 100% |
| Castings | $7.3M | 5% |
