vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Piedmont Realty Trust, Inc. (PDM) and Stoke Therapeutics, Inc. (STOK). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Stoke Therapeutics, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($158.6M vs $143.3M, roughly 1.1× Piedmont Realty Trust, Inc.). Stoke Therapeutics, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 71.2% vs -31.4%, a 102.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Stoke Therapeutics, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (3661.1% vs 0.4%).
Piedmont Realty Trust, Inc. is a publicly traded real estate investment trust (REIT) that owns, operates, and invests in high-quality office properties primarily located in high-growth metropolitan areas across the United States. It serves corporate tenants across multiple industry sectors including technology, professional services, and healthcare, and pursues stable long-term returns for stakeholders via strategic property management and portfolio optimization.
Stoke Therapeutics, Inc. is a clinical-stage biotechnology company developing innovative RNA-targeted therapies for severe rare genetic diseases. Its lead candidates address unmet needs for Dravet syndrome, a rare epilepsy, and other neurological monogenic disorders, serving patients across North America and global markets.
PDM vs STOK — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $143.3M | $158.6M |
| Net Profit | $-45.0M | $112.9M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | — | 70.2% |
| Net Margin | -31.4% | 71.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 0.4% | 3661.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | -27.9% | 528.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.10 | $1.90 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $143.3M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $142.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $139.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $140.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $142.7M | $158.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $143.2M | $22.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $139.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $143.3M | — |
| Q1 26 | $-45.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-43.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-13.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-16.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-10.1M | $112.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-30.0M | $-10.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-11.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-9.8M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 70.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -60.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | -31.4% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -30.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -9.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -12.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -7.1% | 71.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -20.9% | -46.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | -8.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -6.8% | — |
| Q1 26 | $-0.10 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-0.34 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.11 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.14 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.08 | $1.90 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.25 | $-0.15 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.09 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.08 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $2.3M | $274.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.5B | $350.1M |
| Total Assets | $4.0B | $406.9M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $2.3M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $731.0K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.9M | $274.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $109.6M | $128.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $133.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $138.5M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.2B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.2B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.2B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.2B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.2B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.2B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.2B | — |
| Q1 26 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.6B | $350.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6B | $229.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7B | — |
| Q1 26 | $4.0B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.0B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.0B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.0B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.0B | $406.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.1B | $271.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.1B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.2B | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.49× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.43× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.41× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.40× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.40× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.36× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.34× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $131.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $131.7M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 83.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 110.3% | 0.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.17× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $140.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $35.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $50.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.7M | $131.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $198.1M | $-23.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $42.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $66.8M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $131.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-23.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 83.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -102.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | 110.3% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.17× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.