vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Piedmont Realty Trust, Inc. (PDM) and UNIVERSAL TECHNICAL INSTITUTE INC (UTI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
UNIVERSAL TECHNICAL INSTITUTE INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($220.8M vs $142.9M, roughly 1.5× Piedmont Realty Trust, Inc.). UNIVERSAL TECHNICAL INSTITUTE INC runs the higher net margin — 5.8% vs -30.3%, a 36.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, UNIVERSAL TECHNICAL INSTITUTE INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (9.6% vs -0.3%). Over the past eight quarters, UNIVERSAL TECHNICAL INSTITUTE INC's revenue compounded faster (9.5% CAGR vs -0.6%).
Piedmont Realty Trust, Inc. is a publicly traded real estate investment trust (REIT) that owns, operates, and invests in high-quality office properties primarily located in high-growth metropolitan areas across the United States. It serves corporate tenants across multiple industry sectors including technology, professional services, and healthcare, and pursues stable long-term returns for stakeholders via strategic property management and portfolio optimization.
Universal Technical Institute, Inc. (UTI) is a private for-profit system of technical colleges in the United States. It was established in 1965 by Robert Sweet.
PDM vs UTI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $142.9M | $220.8M |
| Net Profit | $-43.2M | $12.8M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | — | 7.1% |
| Net Margin | -30.3% | 5.8% |
| Revenue YoY | -0.3% | 9.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | -44.3% | -42.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.34 | $0.23 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $142.9M | $220.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $139.2M | $222.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $140.3M | $204.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $142.7M | $207.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $143.2M | $201.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $139.3M | $196.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $143.3M | $177.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $144.5M | $184.2M |
| Q4 25 | $-43.2M | $12.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-13.5M | $18.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-16.8M | $10.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-10.1M | $11.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-30.0M | $22.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-11.5M | $18.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-9.8M | $5.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-27.8M | $7.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | 7.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 11.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 6.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 8.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 13.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 13.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 4.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 6.1% |
| Q4 25 | -30.3% | 5.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -9.7% | 8.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -12.0% | 5.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -7.1% | 5.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -20.9% | 11.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | -8.3% | 9.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | -6.8% | 2.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | -19.2% | 4.2% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.34 | $0.23 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.11 | $0.33 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.14 | $0.19 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.08 | $0.21 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.25 | $0.40 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.09 | $0.35 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.08 | $0.09 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.22 | $0.14 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $731.0K | $162.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $2.2B | $101.4M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.5B | $335.9M |
| Total Assets | $4.0B | $834.0M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.49× | 0.30× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $731.0K | $162.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.0M | $169.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.3M | $70.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.9M | $96.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $109.6M | $172.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $133.6M | $161.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $138.5M | $115.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.5M | $116.1M |
| Q4 25 | $2.2B | $101.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.2B | $87.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.2B | $73.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.2B | $94.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.2B | $120.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.2B | $125.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.2B | $137.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.1B | $141.9M |
| Q4 25 | $1.5B | $335.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | $328.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5B | $306.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.6B | $293.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6B | $280.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6B | $260.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7B | $239.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.7B | $232.6M |
| Q4 25 | $4.0B | $834.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.0B | $826.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.0B | $740.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.0B | $720.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.1B | $753.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.1B | $744.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.2B | $706.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.0B | $702.1M |
| Q4 25 | 1.49× | 0.30× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.43× | 0.27× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.41× | 0.24× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.40× | 0.32× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.40× | 0.43× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.36× | 0.48× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.34× | 0.57× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.23× | 0.61× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $140.6M | $3.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-19.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -8.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 10.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 0.24× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $16.6M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $140.6M | $3.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $35.8M | $57.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $50.1M | $18.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.7M | $-789.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $198.1M | $23.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $42.9M | $67.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $66.8M | $10.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $23.4M | $-2.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-19.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $40.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $6.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-11.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $19.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $60.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $3.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-8.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | -8.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 18.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 3.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -5.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 9.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 30.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -4.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | 10.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 7.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 5.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 5.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 4.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 3.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.24× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.04× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.69× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -0.07× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.04× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.58× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.01× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -0.32× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
PDM
| Atlanta GA | $45.7M | 32% |
| Dallas TX | $24.1M | 17% |
| Orlando FL | $19.3M | 13% |
| New York NY | $14.7M | 10% |
| Northern Virginia Washington D.C. | $12.9M | 9% |
| Minneapolis MN | $11.4M | 8% |
| Boston MA | $9.8M | 7% |
| Real Estate Other | $7.8M | 5% |
UTI
| UTI | $142.8M | 65% |
| Concorde | $78.0M | 35% |
