vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. (PECO) and INTERFACE INC (TILE). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
INTERFACE INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($349.4M vs $190.7M, roughly 1.8× Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.). Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 17.4% vs 7.0%, a 10.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (7.0% vs 4.3%). Over the past eight quarters, INTERFACE INC's revenue compounded faster (9.8% CAGR vs 8.7%).
Consolidated Edison, Inc., commonly known as Con Edison or ConEd, is an energy company based in New York City. It is one of the largest investor-owned energy companies in the United States, with approximately $15.26 billion in annual revenues as of 2024, and over $70 billion in assets. The company provides a wide range of energy-related products and services to its customers through its subsidiaries:Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. (CECONY), a regulated utility providing electric...
Interface, Inc., headquartered in Atlanta, Georgia, is a global manufacturer of commercial flooring. The company sells modular carpet tiles, luxury vinyl tile, and Nora brand rubber flooring.
PECO vs TILE — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $190.7M | $349.4M |
| Net Profit | $33.2M | $24.4M |
| Gross Margin | — | 38.6% |
| Operating Margin | — | 10.1% |
| Net Margin | 17.4% | 7.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 7.0% | 4.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | 15.1% | 12.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.24 | $0.41 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $190.7M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $187.9M | $349.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $182.7M | $364.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $177.8M | $375.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $178.3M | $297.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $173.0M | $335.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $165.5M | $344.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $161.5M | $346.6M |
| Q1 26 | $33.2M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $47.5M | $24.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $24.7M | $46.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.8M | $32.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $26.3M | $13.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $18.1M | $21.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.6M | $28.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $15.3M | $22.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 38.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 39.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 39.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 37.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 36.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 37.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 35.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 10.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 14.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 13.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 7.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 8.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 12.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 11.0% |
| Q1 26 | 17.4% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 25.3% | 7.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.5% | 12.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.2% | 8.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.8% | 4.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.5% | 6.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.0% | 8.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.5% | 6.5% |
| Q1 26 | $0.24 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.38 | $0.41 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.20 | $0.78 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.10 | $0.55 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.21 | $0.22 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.16 | $0.38 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.09 | $0.48 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.12 | $0.38 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $3.1M | $71.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $181.6M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.3B | $640.7M |
| Total Assets | $5.4B | $1.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.28× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $3.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.5M | $71.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.1M | $187.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.6M | $121.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.5M | $97.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.9M | $99.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.4M | $115.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.1M | $94.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.4B | $181.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.4B | $307.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.4B | $304.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.3B | $302.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.1B | $302.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1B | $337.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0B | $387.6M |
| Q1 26 | $2.3B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.3B | $640.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.3B | $621.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.3B | $575.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.3B | $513.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.3B | $489.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.2B | $501.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.3B | $451.2M |
| Q1 26 | $5.4B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $5.3B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.3B | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.3B | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.2B | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.0B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.0B | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.9B | $1.2B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.04× | 0.28× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.05× | 0.50× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.04× | 0.53× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.99× | 0.59× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.91× | 0.62× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.94× | 0.67× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.90× | 0.86× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $55.6M | $49.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $28.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 8.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 12.6% | 5.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.67× | 2.02× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $121.7M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $55.6M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $348.1M | $49.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $95.4M | $76.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $96.1M | $30.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $60.5M | $11.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $334.7M | $38.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $109.1M | $76.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $78.5M | $21.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $28.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $66.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $22.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $4.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $24.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $69.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $12.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 8.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 18.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 6.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 7.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 20.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 3.5% |
| Q1 26 | 12.6% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 5.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 4.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.8% |
| Q1 26 | 1.67× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 7.33× | 2.02× | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.87× | 1.66× | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.52× | 0.93× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.30× | 0.90× | ||
| Q4 24 | 18.45× | 1.75× | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.40× | 2.68× | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.14× | 0.95× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
PECO
| Rental income | $186.3M | 98% |
| Fees and management income | $3.4M | 2% |
TILE
| AMS | $205.9M | 59% |
| EAAA | $143.5M | 41% |
